Last modified: 2013-03-12 18:24:12 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T31915, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 29915 - Upgrade the WMF-cluster >= Ubuntu 10.04
Upgrade the WMF-cluster >= Ubuntu 10.04
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: Wikimedia
Classification: Unclassified
General/Unknown (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Highest enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Peter Youngmeisterarius
: tracking
Depends on:
Blocks: tracking 25140 30996 22708 24000 26388 29905 46036
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2011-07-15 20:35 UTC by Sam Reed (reedy)
Modified: 2013-03-12 18:24 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Sam Reed (reedy) 2011-07-15 20:35:39 UTC 
The cluster is overdue an upgrade to 10.04 from 8.04 (granted, some utility servers are already upgraded).

As such, there are many package upgrades etc that will be dealt with by upgrading the OS

Creating this as a tracking bug for it
Comment 1 Brion Vibber 2011-07-15 22:58:17 UTC 
Is this a tracking bug (should depend on the various issues, so them getting fixed makes this one closer to closable) or a bug entry for the upgrade itself (should block them, so that when this one is fixed those can be dealt with)?
Comment 2 Sam Reed (reedy) 2011-07-15 23:23:17 UTC 
(In reply to comment #1)
> Is this a tracking bug (should depend on the various issues, so them getting
> fixed makes this one closer to closable) or a bug entry for the upgrade itself
> (should block them, so that when this one is fixed those can be dealt with)?

I had them as depends originally, but then swapped them over.

These things "should" be fixed (or at least, the upgrade element) when we do the migration of the apaches, image scalers etc etc...
Comment 3 Mark A. Hershberger 2011-07-29 16:22:46 UTC 
http://rt.wikimedia.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=22 is the RT ticket for this.  Ryan Lane is working on this project (updating server binaries) but hasn't said anything since April.  CT is also looking into this.
Comment 4 Sam Reed (reedy) 2011-07-29 16:24:39 UTC 
(In reply to comment #3)
> http://rt.wikimedia.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=22 is the RT ticket for this. 
> Ryan Lane is working on this project (updating server binaries) but hasn't said
> anything since April.  CT is also looking into this.

I think it's a case of too much ops work, not enough ops staff members

Hopefully with the couple of extra new hires, we'll get some more activity soon
Comment 5 Ryan Lane 2011-08-17 00:54:09 UTC 
The imagescalers can likely be upgraded very soon. Upgrades were tested in the past, but weren't pushed to all nodes. We need to retest with the het deploy changes, then we can upgrade that cluster.

We'll likely start there, then test changes for normal apaches.
Comment 6 Mark A. Hershberger 2011-08-18 16:09:28 UTC 
Assigning this to Peter Y. so he can post updates on the progress of this.
Comment 7 Krinkle 2011-08-24 18:20:45 UTC 
Renaming bug to be a task instead.
Comment 8 Mark A. Hershberger 2011-10-15 17:27:05 UTC 
it was completed recently
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.

Navigation
Links