Last modified: 2010-05-15 15:38:01 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 2616 - Image resize isn't proportional
Image resize isn't proportional
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
File management (Other open bugs)
All All
: Normal normal (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
Depends on:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2005-06-29 20:25 UTC by Sean Lamb
Modified: 2010-05-15 15:38 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Description Sean Lamb 2005-06-29 20:25:55 UTC
The image within the infobox on is
smaller than the infobox's standard 280px wide.  The infobox stretches it
sideways but doesn't stretch it vertically by the same proportion like it did
before the upgrade this week.  It appears that the troublemaker is the "none"
modifier in the image tag.

The following code in the Wikipedia Sandbox demonstrates the issue:

[[Image:John W. Garrett.jpg|none|280px|John W. Garret]] <!-- distorted -->
[[Image:John W. Garrett.jpg|thumb|280px|John W. Garret]] <!-- proportional
resize -->
Comment 1 Sean Lamb 2005-06-29 21:09:51 UTC
Just realized I didn't leave my editing/viewing software info...

Primary viewing platform:
  SuSE Linux 9.0 with current updates
  Firefox 1.0.2
Also tested (bug appears there too):
  Konqueror 3.1.4
Comment 2 Sean Lamb 2005-06-30 01:18:50 UTC
Tested and confirmed on Firefox 1.0 and MSIE 6.0.2800.1106.xpsp2.050301-1526;
Windows XP.
Comment 3 David Benbennick 2005-07-01 18:33:08 UTC
See [[User:Dbenbenn/sandbox]].  With a "frame", the image is not scaled up at all.  
With "thumb", the image is scaled correctly.  With no frame, the width is scaled, but not the 

Looking at the page source is instructive.  The HTML <img> tags are

 none: <img ... width="200" height="39" longdesc="/wiki/Image:WikiThanks.png" />
 frame: <img ... width="43" height="39" longdesc="/wiki/Image:WikiThanks.png" />
 thumb: <img ... width="200" height="181" longdesc="/wiki/Image:WikiThanks.png" />

The (height, width) should be (181, 200) in all three cases.
Comment 4 Antoine "hashar" Musso (WMF) 2005-07-04 01:10:00 UTC
Fixed by fixing bug #2632 . It's comitted in cvs and should
be live soon ;)

Thanks for the report.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 2632 ***
Comment 5 Brion Vibber 2005-07-04 19:25:19 UTC
Not a duplicate of bug 2632.
Comment 6 Brion Vibber 2005-07-04 19:35:09 UTC
Made a correct fix for this now: the height was incorrectly calculated.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.