Last modified: 2010-10-30 13:04:17 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T25732, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 23732 - Mostimages counts image links
Mostimages counts image links
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
Special pages (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
: patch
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2010-05-31 16:22 UTC by Umherirrender
Modified: 2010-10-30 13:04 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---

Attachments
change description from nlinks to nimagelinks (1.55 KB, patch)
2010-06-02 18:09 UTC, Umherirrender 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Umherirrender 2010-05-31 16:22:29 UTC 
The special page says, that the count are links, but there are image links, because the table imagelinks is used.

So please change from links to image links. Thanks.
Comment 1 Bawolff (Brian Wolff) 2010-06-01 18:27:36 UTC 
Wouldn't one be able to determine from context that it is referring to images being embeded not links to image page.
Comment 2 Umherirrender 2010-06-02 18:01:38 UTC 
I do not think so, because that is a technical different. Not all user of a wiki knows that. Special:Whatlinkshere always added (image link) behind a image link and nothing behind a normal link.
Comment 3 Umherirrender 2010-06-02 18:09:19 UTC 
Created attachment 7424 [details]
change description from nlinks to nimagelinks
Comment 4 Bryan Tong Minh 2010-10-24 15:37:48 UTC 
It would be even more clear to use "Used on $1 pages" right?
Comment 5 Umherirrender 2010-10-30 12:20:24 UTC 
(In reply to comment #4)
> It would be even more clear to use "Used on $1 pages" right?

Yes, that text is ok.
Comment 6 Bryan Tong Minh 2010-10-30 13:04:17 UTC 
Fixed in r75694.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.

Navigation
Links