Last modified: 2012-12-12 13:33:28 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T20724, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 18724 - Allow different levels of hiding with wpHideUser
Allow different levels of hiding with wpHideUser
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
User blocking (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Lowest normal with 1 vote (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks: SWMT
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2009-05-09 00:53 UTC by Mike.lifeguard
Modified: 2012-12-12 13:33 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Mike.lifeguard 2009-05-09 00:53:05 UTC
Similar to bug 18723, we'd like the ability to set how hidden a user is when using wpHideUser. With other parts of revision deletion, you can set whether content is hidden from sysops or not & the same would be useful for block-hiding.
Comment 1 Aaron Schulz 2009-05-11 23:49:16 UTC
Who? What would the usage of lower levels be?
Comment 2 Mike.lifeguard 2009-05-11 23:52:37 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> Who? What would the usage of lower levels be?
> 

Hiding usernames which are insulting/libelous but don't contain personally identifiable information.
Comment 3 Aaron Schulz 2009-05-12 00:07:03 UTC
Why would anyone want to hide names that are just insulting, looks like overkill. The other category needs more elaboration. What Oversights want this? Adding new ways to make account names disappear is fairly serious, so some details and rationales are in order.
Comment 4 Aaron Schulz 2009-05-26 12:09:48 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> Why would anyone want to hide names that are just insulting, looks like
> overkill. The other category needs more elaboration. What Oversights want this?
> Adding new ways to make account names disappear is fairly serious, so some
> details and rationales are in order.
> 

Putting this on hold now.
Comment 5 Andre Klapper 2012-12-12 13:33:28 UTC
[Removing RESOLVED LATER as discussed in
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2012-November/064240.html .
and setting to WONTFIX as per comment 3.]

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links