Last modified: 2009-04-02 18:04:04 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T20185, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 18185 - Hide action which contains insulting user name from Special:Log
Hide action which contains insulting user name from Special:Log
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
General/Unknown (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal normal with 3 votes (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Log
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2009-03-26 21:57 UTC by DerHexer
Modified: 2009-04-02 18:04 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description DerHexer 2009-03-26 21:57:10 UTC
If I hide a user name via global permission "hideuser" that user name is removed from Special:Log/newusers and /block. But if that user has created socks like it was done here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=User:Thogo%20=%20Thomas%20Goldammer. (don't miss the dot at the end!) the creating user name is hidden but not the sock account, although I've hidden both! Could you please hide (or strike [like it's done on Special:Ipblocklist]) those lines on the logs which contain links to accounts which were hidden via global permission "hideuser"?

Kind regards
DerHexer
Comment 1 Mike.lifeguard 2009-04-02 18:01:24 UTC
I originally wanted to dupe this to bug 14476, but this is about /local/ hiding...

I think this was fixed by r48641 - now we don't let admins (ie those without the rights to use wpHideUser) to modify the blocks. What happened here (it seems) is that NawlinWiki modified the block after you did - but since he can't use wpHideUser, it wasn't a hidden block & so we can see it in the log. That's badness, but shouldn't be possible any longer. Such things can be cleaned up by re-blocking with wpHideUser and having an oversighter clean the logs.
Comment 2 Aaron Schulz 2009-04-02 18:04:04 UTC
Yes, done in r48886. This should be synced by now.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links