Last modified: 2011-05-22 19:59:00 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 18129 - Allow defining multiple "channels" for CodeReview for particular subdirectories
Allow defining multiple "channels" for CodeReview for particular subdirectories
Status: NEW
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
CodeReview (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Low normal (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on: 18012
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2009-03-24 18:24 UTC by Brion Vibber
Modified: 2011-05-22 19:59 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Brion Vibber 2009-03-24 18:24:16 UTC
Within our SVN repository we have a number of different things going on, which can and should generally be treated as fairly separate "channels":

* MediaWiki core
* Various MediaWiki extensions
* Release branches of the above
* Lucene search server and various other related projects

It would be useful to be able to set up, for instance, a "mainline" channel covering:
* MediaWiki core trunk
* MediaWiki extensions used by Wikimedia

which me and/or Tim could use for primary code review that's targeting mainline development and putting things live.

Meanwhile other extensions or tools could be viewed separately. Each channel could also be assigned its own reviewers or 'super-reviewers' :D with extra permissions to confirm review actions done by other people.
Comment 1 Brion Vibber 2009-08-04 21:47:31 UTC
Bumping priority on this; with more active branches being worked on, and integration of test results etc it'll be a lot easier to pick a branch to work on and have paging work consistently within it.
Comment 2 Sam Reed (reedy) 2011-05-22 19:59:00 UTC
bug 25270 is a variant of this...

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links