Last modified: 2011-08-15 05:31:41 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 17047 - Change to
Change to
Product: Wikimedia
Classification: Unclassified
Language setup (Other open bugs)
All All
: Normal normal with 1 vote (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
Depends on:
Blocks: wikis-to-rename
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2009-01-17 11:17 UTC by Kjetil Lenes
Modified: 2011-08-15 05:31 UTC (History)
10 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Description Kjetil Lenes 2009-01-17 11:17:54 UTC
The language code no implies both forms of written norwegian; bokmaal with the code nb and nynorsk with the code nn. Since now only allows articles written in bokmaal the domain name should change accordingly. Articles written in nynorsk are currently placed on, as they should be.
Comment 1 Stig Meireles Johansen 2009-01-17 11:37:22 UTC
There is no consensus at nowiki for this change yet. We are currently about to possibly start a voting on this subject.
Comment 2 Oddeivind 2009-01-19 07:03:59 UTC
It is problematic to have a majority vote on this. Nynorsk and bokmål are both official languages and both therefore have an absolute right on the domain It should therefore be up to the nynorsk wikipedia alone to decide on this. 
Comment 3 nsaa 2009-01-19 08:17:18 UTC
There's a lengthy discussion on about the issue
regarding moving to There's no agreement on
the moving, and even then, it's not correct to place this wiki under the
language code nb. The official bokmål (nb code) is regulated by Språkrådet
( and the riksmål is
regulated by the academy Det Norske Akademi for Sprog og Litteratur
( Both forms are allowed and no. cover it better.  
Comment 4 nsaa 2009-01-19 08:19:01 UTC
See also the related
Comment 5 Gunnar Birch 2009-02-03 02:07:13 UTC
This bug has been filed by users of the Nynorsk Wikipedia, At, the wiki that these persons are proposing to move, there is widespread opposition to a move: almost twice the number of opposers compared to those in support of a move.

It concerns me that users of the Nynorsk Wikipedia are trying to end-run the consensus on the Bokmål Wikipedia by going directly to developers, posting on mailing lists and so on without mentioning that the Wikipedia they are asking to move does NOT support a move. I urge all developers not to take any action unless without checking what the actual consensus on is.

Since 2005, the two Norwegian Wikipedias have co-existed under peaceful conditions, with links to each other on main pages and other sorts of mutual agreements for the benefit of both wikis. I am dismayed to see that the Nynorsk users are now again trying to harm the Bokmål project by forcing it to move to an unpopular and unknown URL, instead of improving their own project, which would be a much more constructive endeavour.
Comment 6 Niklas Laxström 2009-02-03 09:29:18 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
It concerns me that you are describing the situation as a hostile political power struggle between the two projects and inviting them to a fight with your accusations and this bugzilla is the last place we want any fights. Developers, who do decisions, which should be based on facts and opinions of involved parties, are now afraid of making any changes. Throwing gasoline on the fire is not going to solve any struggles there might be.
Comment 7 Oddeivind 2009-02-03 12:36:02 UTC
Not taking a position on the stuggle actually is the name as supporting the status quo, therebye supporting one side. 
Comment 8 Oddeivind 2009-02-03 12:43:16 UTC
The opinion on the bokmål wikipedia is not really relevant (nor particularly interesting), as the no-code is bokmål+nynorsk. Thus, the same way that I dont have any legitimate right to refuse my brother part of the inheritance from my father, the same way bokmål wikipedia doesnt have any legitimate right to refuse nynorskwikipedia the same access to this code. And I repeat, if the Wikimdeia Foundation, or some other higher authority, does not take a decision to move to nb, they will in fact STILL have supported one side, that is the side supporting the statusn quo. There is in fact, really no neutral position on this, a non-decision is ALSO a decision! 

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.