Last modified: 2014-06-16 18:17:55 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T18575, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 16575 - Global transclusion/userpage
Global transclusion/userpage
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 4547
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
Interface (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal enhancement with 5 votes (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikime...
:
Depends on: 9890
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2008-12-06 03:52 UTC by Joshua Ciappara
Modified: 2014-06-16 18:17 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Joshua Ciappara 2008-12-06 03:52:37 UTC 
Please see here <http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Forum#Global_userpage>. There seems to be general agreement about a function that would allow for a type of "global userpage". Further to that, some have suggested that a form of global transclusion would be useful. I understand that this is not a simple task, but its usefulness is quite clear. Hoping that you could work on it.
Comment 1 Chad H. 2008-12-13 19:48:22 UTC 
Duping to the bug about enabling cross-wiki transclusion (which already exists) on WMF projects. I know there's a bug about single user pages but A) I can't find it, and B) You can only dupe to one bug.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 4547 ***
Comment 2 Melancholie 2008-12-14 04:57:39 UTC 
> I know there's a bug about single user pages

Did you maybe mean bug 13953?
Comment 3 Nemo 2009-08-19 19:01:08 UTC 
(In reply to comment #2)
> Did you maybe mean bug 13953?
> 

I think it's bug 14759
Comment 4 Rich Farmbrough 2009-09-04 17:24:19 UTC 
This may or may not dupe 4547 depending on how they are read.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.

Navigation
Links