Last modified: 2007-09-09 11:01:20 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T11998, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 9998 - Articles counter on [[be:]] ought to be updated
Articles counter on [[be:]] ought to be updated
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: Wikimedia
Classification: Unclassified
General/Unknown (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal enhancement with 3 votes (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
: shell
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2007-05-22 08:14 UTC by Yury Tarasievich
Modified: 2007-09-09 11:01 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Yury Tarasievich 2007-05-22 08:14:32 UTC
The articles counter on [[be:]] got wrong after the migration from incubator, somehow. The semi-manual checking of pages in the articles' namespace for fulfilling the [[nosemicolon]] criterium yields quite bigger count.

So, please update the articles' counter on [[be:]]. As far as I understand, this is a matter of running the maintenance/updateArticleCount.php script.

Thanks.
Comment 1 Yury Tarasievich 2007-06-07 21:08:56 UTC
There's a definite feeling on this side that the counter is still mis-functioning. Seemingly, "old" pages which were fixed (w/r to their content "qualifying" them to be counted as articles) *after* the update of the counter, are not included in the number shown by the NUMOFARTICLES template. Roughly counted there's about 1 thousand difference.

Therefore, I'm re-opening this bug, to see whether this would help.

Also, I'm asking if there couldn't exist some logical error in the NUMOFARTICLES, preventing it to count changes in the existing pages real-time?

Thanks.
Comment 2 Yury Tarasievich 2007-06-14 14:18:12 UTC
So, how'll it be? Is it too much trouble?

I re-checked the pages and about 570 pages complying with the "article" specs aren't counted in, counter should be at least 5850+. So, the counter is missing about 10% of the total.
Comment 3 Rob Church 2007-06-14 14:24:35 UTC
There is a moderate backlog of bugs requiring the attention of shell users. Please be patient.
Comment 4 JeLuF 2007-09-09 11:01:20 UTC
The counter has been off by 14 articles, it's now 6841 instead of 6855.

=> Closed.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links