Last modified: 2007-06-05 02:39:32 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 9886 - Provide a means to give an example "stub" link in "stubthreshold" message
Provide a means to give an example "stub" link in "stubthreshold" message
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
Interface (Other open bugs)
All All
: Low enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
Depends on:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2007-05-12 04:00 UTC by Rob Church
Modified: 2007-06-05 02:39 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Description Rob Church 2007-05-12 04:00:44 UTC
It would be nice if users could see what a "stub link" looked like when setting
a stub threshold in their preferences. The "stubthreshold" message, used as a
label for the relevant option, is being treated as plain text.

Either we'll need to enable HTML for that message (which reignites a dangerous
precedent), or we'll want to provide some nifty workaround.
Comment 1 Rob Church 2007-05-18 21:11:00 UTC
Fixed in r22245.
Comment 2 Brion Vibber 2007-05-21 18:47:20 UTC
Reverted in r22303

Adding a class for the example is not only ugly, it's fragile -- customizations to the actual threshold will have no effect on the sample.
The sensible thing is to construct an actual bit of sample text using the actual classes -- a null link (<a href="#">) with appropriate class would show the effect nicely and be robust to customizations.
Comment 3 Rob Church 2007-06-05 02:39:32 UTC
Fixed again using a much simpler, cleaner method in r22740.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.