Last modified: 2007-05-11 09:47:12 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T11873, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 9873 - Update for Cantonese language (zh-yue) #31, Update for Chinese (PRC) and Chinese (Taiwan) localisation (zh-cn/zh-tw)
Update for Cantonese language (zh-yue) #31, Update for Chinese (PRC) and Chin...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
Internationalization (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:UIT
: patch
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2007-05-11 06:15 UTC by Shinjiman
Modified: 2007-05-11 09:47 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments
MessagesZhoSeries.php.patch (7.41 KB, patch)
2007-05-11 06:15 UTC, Shinjiman
Details

Description Shinjiman 2007-05-11 06:15:18 UTC
Hi the developers, the updated version of the Cantonese/Chinese (Taiwan)/Chinese 
(PRC) messages php scripts is 
available.

* The updated revision of the Cantonese translations is tested without problems 
in a local wiki against SVN revision r22037.

++ Added
*ipblocklist-empty
*ipblocklist-no-results

!!Modified/fixed
*otherlanguages (yue)
*ipaddress
*ipadressorusername
*ipbexpiry
*ipbreason
*ipbother
*ipbotherreason

--Removed
*ipblocklistempty

thanks and regards
Shinjiman
Comment 1 Shinjiman 2007-05-11 06:15:45 UTC
Created attachment 3620 [details]
MessagesZhoSeries.php.patch

This is the patch file for patching the message arrays for Cantonese, Chinese
(PRC) and Chinese (Taiwan) languages.
Comment 2 Shinjiman 2007-05-11 06:17:58 UTC
In comment #0, the messages should be match against r22072, not for r22037.
Comment 3 Raimond Spekking 2007-05-11 09:47:12 UTC
Applied with r22103.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links