Last modified: 2007-04-26 16:17:08 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 9582 - Assign autopatrol to usergroup bot
Assign autopatrol to usergroup bot
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
General/Unknown (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
: shell
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2007-04-14 23:46 UTC by Effeietsanders
Modified: 2007-04-26 16:17 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Effeietsanders 2007-04-14 23:46:59 UTC
Would it be possible to assign the autopatrol to the bots too? Atm the
autopatrol has been activated for sysops. I think it makes sense to autopatrol
bots too, as they dont appear in the log etc, but they do on newarticles. Bots
are as well some kind of trusted users, we trust that what they do is OK, so
patrolling is not needed I guess. (Otherwise they shouldn't be bot) Thanks. 

please do this for all projects with autopatrol, but I am asking this
specifically for wikibooks NL. But well, it makes imho sense to make this
general :)
Comment 1 Aryeh Gregor (not reading bugmail, please e-mail directly) 2007-04-23 02:02:59 UTC
This makes sense to me as a software change.  What do others think?
Comment 2 Aryeh Gregor (not reading bugmail, please e-mail directly) 2007-04-24 16:45:30 UTC
This doesn't need shell if it's enabled as a software change.  The bot flag is
meant to prevent bots' edits from having to be reviewed, more or less, on the
assumption that they're probably trivial and all basically the same.  It makes
sense to extend that from RC to also apply to edit-patrolling.  Obviously some
bots' edits should be reviewed, but those shouldn't have the bot flag to start with.
Comment 3 Brion Vibber 2007-04-26 16:17:08 UTC
Sensible. I've added it to the defaults in r21623

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links