Last modified: 2008-10-06 16:13:12 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 9431 - subsumed edit difficulty
subsumed edit difficulty
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
General/Unknown (Other open bugs)
PC Windows 2000
: Normal normal (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
Depends on:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2007-03-28 01:30 UTC by ww
Modified: 2008-10-06 16:13 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Description ww 2007-03-28 01:30:07 UTC
I patrol a few hundred articles on Wikipedia, at least glancing at all edits in
each, and in recent months someone has helpfully changed the normal Wikipedia
behavior by 'streamlining' annoying displays of intermediate edits, thus
benefiting us all by hiding some or several previous edits. "So many
intermediate edits not shown" has become a informational message from the
Infernal Regions in consequence. The presentation of the difference display from
'edit history' now doesn't bother with showing them if one selects a diff more
than a few edits wide, making things more difficult. So a heavily trafficed
article might have 15-20 changes in the last 24 hours (since last check) which
require checking, and if 13-19 of them are intermediate edits not shown,
checking them becomes quite difficult. Vandalism survives longer, sensible edits
don't get done, and so on. 

I suggest an option -- global would be fine in my case not necessarily per
session or page history diff display -- which shows all intermediate edits, or
the last x edits (with x perhaps settable by the editor?), or the current behavior. 

why bother:
The point of fixing this bug -- or modifying this feature, depending on
perspective -- is to more efficient use of the available editor time of those
who watchlist WP articles for supervision and review.
Comment 1 Aaron Schulz 2007-03-28 01:34:20 UTC
If the current revision is vandalized, won't that be apparent in the diff?
Unless it was already reverted, but then that means that vandalism is not
lasting any longer.
Comment 2 ww 2007-03-29 18:43:23 UTC
The difficulty is not so much rvv for recent posts by the socially retarded
malicious -- especially the most recent such posting. It's article maintenance
over time, really. Say that 20 edits were made in the last day (ie, since I last
came by the article -- and I check (or used to until this 'feature' was
installed) every edit in my watchlisted articles), this 'feature has the effect
of concealing nearly all of those edits. Perhaps they would be fine additions to
that WP article, or perhaps not, but if concealed in this way, some -- in
practice most -- escape my patrolling eye. For some of these articles, I appear
to be the only regular patrolling eye...
Comment 3 Roan Kattouw 2008-10-06 16:13:12 UTC
From the united diff page, simply click Previous diff, then Next diff, which will get you to the first diff that was part of the united diff. From there, you can easily walk through all diffs with the Next diff link.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.