Last modified: 2007-03-02 17:59:33 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 9059 - Allow link like [[target page|[[Image:Imagename|options...]]]], as expected
Allow link like [[target page|[[Image:Imagename|options...]]]], as expected
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 539
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
Parser (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal enhancement with 2 votes (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2007-02-22 02:53 UTC by Aryeh Gregor (not reading bugmail, please e-mail directly)
Modified: 2007-03-02 17:59 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Aryeh Gregor (not reading bugmail, please e-mail directly) 2007-02-22 02:53:16 UTC
Okay, now that we've finally caved to the users' image-linking desires, could we
use a more obvious syntax for the simple case of one image = one link?  This can
be optional, if we think anyone objects to using images to link to pages, but
there's no sense in forcing people to use some convoluted but powerful imagemap
syntax to get a perfectly obvious effect.  And it should probably be in core
code, for simplicity if nothing else (the something else being that this is
probably among the top ten requests in #mediawiki).

For simplicity, it might be best to allow only inline images to be linked, at
least at first, because that way we can just let the <a> wrap the image.  Stuff
stuck in divs should be dealt with too at some point, but that will be more
tricky because you need to stick the <a> in the middle around the <img> proper
(and what should happen in the case of captions is perhaps not immediately
obvious, although I suppose it should just link the image and nothing else).
Comment 1 Jamie Hari 2007-03-02 15:36:39 UTC
I was JUST about to log this request... 
Same syntax and everything. :)

How would one handle it currently, as a workaround?
Comment 2 Rob Church 2007-03-02 17:59:33 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> How would one handle it currently, as a workaround?

Using the ImageMap extension.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 539 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links