Last modified: 2011-03-13 18:06:25 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 891 - feature request: additional informations showing full syntax should be included in pages as "No target"
feature request: additional informations showing full syntax should be includ...
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
Special pages (Other open bugs)
PC Windows XP
: Lowest enhancement with 1 vote (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
Depends on:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2004-11-16 05:32 UTC by lɛʁi לערי ריינהארט
Modified: 2011-03-13 18:06 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Description lɛʁi לערי ריינהארט 2004-11-16 05:32:28 UTC
[[en:Special:Contributions]] called without the target parameter just 
shows "No target".

It would be a(nother) just "nice to have" feature if the special pages 
would provide the valid syntax for this page.

It maight be a good idea to include a "tag" (?) / "selector" 
called "Syntax" at the top of EVERY page, not only for special pages but 
also for the pages in the other namespaces.

Wikipedia is an "open" world. This is valid both for the articles, the 
documentation, the "knowledge" and the "good to know's". (Peronlay) I 
think putting a "Syntax" "tag" (?) / "selector" at the top of the pages 
would be the most appropriate place, usefull, easy to find, easy to update 
(from documentation point of view) and so on.

If a project specific text field containing links relevant to that project 
(in that language), [[meta:]] and so on should be included is another 
issue to discuss. What do you think about this?

Regards Reinhardt

Bugs related (somehow) to this: bug 884 (about providing more information 
at the "Bad title" page)
Comment 1 lɛʁi לערי ריינהארט 2004-11-16 05:48:15 UTC
See also (about documentation) [[en:User talk:IMSoP#appendix_4]] == [[User 
talk:IMSoP#appendix_4]] == [[User_talk:IMSoP#appendix_4]] <> [[User talk:IMSoP#appendix 
4]] (the last one misses the anchor).

Regards Reinhardt
Comment 2 Rowan Collins [IMSoP] 2004-11-16 14:36:30 UTC
I can see where you're coming from with this, but generally speaking the
software should make it unnecessary to construct these URLs anyway - the
software should generate them when you click the appropriate part of the syntax.
Of course, anyone writing a bot, or doing something particularly complex with
templates, would benefit from knowing how to generalise, but usually clicking
through a couple of examples should be enough to find out.

As for the specific example of the error produced by a special page that needs a
particular parameter, perhaps the best thing would be a message like "This page
shows the contributions of a particular user, but no user was specified." and
provide a box where the name of the user can be typed in. In fact, it could just
say "Type in the name of the user for whom you wish to see contributions: " and
forget that, as far as the software is concerned, this is an error. As I say,
the user should generally not be required to know the internal URL "syntax",
they should just be given an interface that constructs it for them.
Comment 3 Brion Vibber 2004-11-16 21:10:54 UTC
Agreed with Rowan's comments; please file separate bugs for each 
special page which doesn't provide a useful prompt when visited 
directly but should.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.