Last modified: 2007-08-01 10:04:23 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T10878, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 8878 - Changes to $dateFormats in MessagesDe.php
Changes to $dateFormats in MessagesDe.php
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
Internationalization (Other open bugs)
1.7.x
All All
: Normal enhancement with 1 vote (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
: patch
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2007-02-04 17:18 UTC by Schnargel
Modified: 2007-08-01 10:04 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---

Attachments
dateFormats patch (958 bytes, patch)
2007-02-04 17:19 UTC, Schnargel 		Details
modified date time patch (883 bytes, patch)
2007-02-05 17:08 UTC, Raimond Spekking 		Details
New date/time format (924 bytes, patch)
2007-05-10 20:36 UTC, Raimond Spekking 		Details
Show Obsolete (2) Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Schnargel 2007-02-04 17:18:18 UTC 
Changes:
- removing unused, nonexistent formats
- putting time after date
Comment 1 Schnargel 2007-02-04 17:19:08 UTC 
Created attachment 3180 [details]
dateFormats patch
Comment 2 Raimond Spekking 2007-02-05 17:08:12 UTC 
Created attachment 3186 [details]
modified date time patch

With r19788 I have changed the format slightly (haven't seen this bug) to avoid
the abbreviation point for the month "Mai" (may). This modified patch reflects
this change.
Comment 3 Raimond Spekking 2007-05-10 20:36:38 UTC 
Created attachment 3618 [details]
New date/time format

I propose a change to these format:

1. Standard
2. 15. Jan. 2001, 16:12
3. 16:12, 15. Jan. 2001
4. 2001-01-15T16:12:34

No 3. is the actual standard. I see no reason why to delete it. I assume most
users will miss it.

The formats
16:12, Jan. 15. 2001
16:12, 2001 Jan. 15
are really unusual. I think no one will miss them...
Comment 4 Raimond Spekking 2007-08-01 10:04:23 UTC 
Applied with a few modifications with r24514.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.

Navigation
Links