Last modified: 2010-12-10 21:57:45 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 8827 - Parser doesn't close OL and LI before a DIV
Parser doesn't close OL and LI before a DIV
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
Parser (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Lowest minor with 1 vote (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
http://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?...
: parser
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2007-01-30 08:34 UTC by Connel MacKenzie
Modified: 2010-12-10 21:57 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Connel MacKenzie 2007-01-30 08:34:16 UTC
http://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk%3Aen-noun&diff=2009519&oldid=2009131

Funky template allows Wiktionary the ability to split user preferences for
"boxy" vs "normal" (my apologies for my part in that evil template.)

If Template is used anywhere after something indented or bulleted, the <DIV>
starts before the OL or LI (or both) are closed.  This then causes the "display:
none" of the DIV to get ignore, so that the "boxy" style appears when it should not.
Comment 1 Connel MacKenzie 2007-01-30 16:48:47 UTC
Note that while this does seem to be a "real" problem, the en.wiktionary example
is poor; procedurally that evil template is not supposed to be used that way,
anyhow.

Offhand, I can't think of any case where this couldn't be worked-around
trivially, once recognized.  Please change this request priority to "trivial
enhancement" or somesuch, as fixing it would very likely break numerous other
things.
Comment 2 DieBuche 2010-12-10 21:57:45 UTC
Can't reproduce anymore

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links