Last modified: 2007-01-17 16:17:39 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 8391 - Allow "autoconfirmed" status to depend upon edit count, as well as account age
Allow "autoconfirmed" status to depend upon edit count, as well as account age
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
General/Unknown (Other open bugs)
1.9.x
All All
: Normal enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Rotem Liss
: patch, patch-need-review
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2006-12-26 14:50 UTC by Rotem Liss
Modified: 2007-01-17 16:17 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments
Patch (2.11 KB, patch)
2006-12-26 14:52 UTC, Rotem Liss
Details
Patch (2.33 KB, patch)
2006-12-26 15:19 UTC, Rotem Liss
Details

Description Rotem Liss 2006-12-26 14:50:06 UTC
Now that user edit count is tracked in user.user_editcount, it's possible to add
an optional limitation for autoconfirmed users, using the variable
$wgAutoConfirmEdits (defaults to 0).
Comment 1 Rotem Liss 2006-12-26 14:52:16 UTC
Created attachment 2961 [details]
Patch
Comment 2 Rotem Liss 2006-12-26 15:19:57 UTC
Created attachment 2962 [details]
Patch

Setting $this->mEditcount to 0 in User::loadDefaults.
Comment 3 Brion Vibber 2006-12-27 01:59:02 UTC
A potential issue with this is that when using memcached, cached User objects
will not
necessarily receive the updated edit count after each edit. Doing a cache-clear on
the edit count incrementer probably would fix this.
Comment 4 Rob Church 2007-01-17 16:17:39 UTC
Werdna has apparently added this in r19376.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links