Last modified: 2007-03-06 17:33:23 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 8302 - i18n for Makebot, NewestPages, Patroller and UserImages extensions (zho series,yue)
i18n for Makebot, NewestPages, Patroller and UserImages extensions (zho serie...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
General/Unknown (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:UIT
: patch
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2006-12-18 07:46 UTC by Shinjiman
Modified: 2007-03-06 17:33 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments
MWExtensions.6.zho.patch (11.49 KB, patch)
2006-12-18 07:47 UTC, Shinjiman
Details
MWExtensions.6.zho.patch (13.72 KB, patch)
2006-12-29 06:46 UTC, Shinjiman
Details

Description Shinjiman 2006-12-18 07:46:18 UTC
Hi, I've just translated the Chinese and Cantonese messages for the Makebot,
NewestPages, Patroller and UserImages extensions, the Chinese messages are
mostly dumped from the Chinese Wikipedia project. May the developers please
update the extension messages? And thanks 華德禹, 下一次登录, KilluaZaoldyeck
(翔風·艾倫·獲加), Hillgentleman and others to translate those messages in the
Chinese Wikipedia project.
Hope these new messages can be applied into other projects with lesser work. :)

thanks and regards
Shinjiman
Comment 1 Shinjiman 2006-12-18 07:47:30 UTC
Created attachment 2895 [details]
MWExtensions.6.zho.patch

This is the patch file of the Chinese language(zho) and Cantonese language(yue)
messages for the Makebot, NewestPages, Patroller and UserImages extensions.
Comment 2 Rob Church 2006-12-18 12:29:49 UTC
The UserImages extension is not GPL.
Comment 3 Shinjiman 2006-12-18 14:05:24 UTC
So is that the UserImages extension cannot be localised at this moment?

And also the others are okay to commit the changes?
Comment 4 Rob Church 2006-12-18 14:10:15 UTC
That's not the case; rather, be careful what you add into it; in an ideal
situation, the translations would have the same licence as the rest of the code
(BSD licence).
Comment 5 Shinjiman 2006-12-18 14:31:00 UTC
Currently, The Makebot extension is licensed as GPLv2+, the NewestPages and
Patroller extensions are licensed as GPLv2, and no licence details for
UserImages extension.

So I and the other authors need to publish those extensions under GPLv2? (I am
currently asking others to let the texts licensed under GPL, which is at
[[w:zh:Wikipedia:互助客栈/技术#有關巡邏員、機器人加收權、用戶圖像以及新頁面擴展
的介面翻譯]].)
Comment 6 Rob Church 2006-12-18 14:33:27 UTC
Ah, just go ahead and apply the patches. If the FSF or anyone else complains,
we'll tell them where to go.
Comment 7 Shinjiman 2006-12-18 14:57:07 UTC
So I need to take some time to add the author/license details and resubmit the
new patch later, also maybe need to fix some mistyped letters. :)
Comment 8 Shinjiman 2006-12-19 04:53:57 UTC
I think I need to split up the patches above to claim that which extension
translations are published to which license.
Comment 9 Shinjiman 2006-12-29 06:46:49 UTC
Created attachment 2975 [details]
MWExtensions.6.zho.patch

Just added the author info of those extensions.

The patches for these extensions are hereby released under GPLv2 or later. See
the pages for licensing info:
*
[[zh:Wikipedia:互助客栈/技术#有關巡邏員、機器人加收權、用戶圖像以及新頁面擴展的介面翻譯]]
(Chinese messages)
* [[zh-yue:User
talk:Hillgentleman#有關Makebot,NewestPages同埋Patroller嘅擴展翻譯]]
(Cantonese messages)
Comment 10 Shinjiman 2006-12-29 06:48:33 UTC
And also, The UserImages extension should be licenced unde GPLv2 or later,
according to the README file of the MediaWiki Software. I get no idea what you
are saying at comment #4. As quoted from the readme file, 'The contributors hold
the copyright to this work, and it is licensed
under the terms of the GNU General Public License, version 2 or later[1]
(see http://www.fsf.org/licenses/gpl.html). Derivative works and later
versions of the code must be free software licensed under the same
terms. This includes "extensions" that use MediaWiki functions or
variables; see http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLAndPlugins
for details.' The extensions that created should be licensed under GPLv2 or
later, not in others as you are said at comment #4 (BSD licence).
Comment 11 Rob Church 2006-12-29 09:20:33 UTC
Fine, that's simple to work around. As far as I'm concerned, it's dual-licenced.
Comment 12 Shinjiman 2006-12-29 16:04:55 UTC
So for your information, which extension(s) are dual-licenced? I hereby to
released under the same licence that the extension(s) have. :)

As far as I know that the files in the SVN repos does not mention thae which
licence(s) have been licensed. For example the UserImages extension: 

UserImages.php
http://svn.wikimedia.org/viewvc/mediawiki/trunk/extensions/UserImages/UserImages.php?revision=18389

UserImages.class.php
http://svn.wikimedia.org/viewvc/mediawiki/trunk/extensions/UserImages/UserImages.class.php?revision=18388

UserImages.i18n.php
http://svn.wikimedia.org/viewvc/mediawiki/trunk/extensions/UserImages/UserImages.i18n.php?revision=18388

From those files above, there's no such information (as of the revisions above)
to telling that those extensions are dual licensed. So I assume that
extension(s) is licenced under GPLv2 or later, according the information given
from the README file
(http://svn.wikimedia.org/viewvc/mediawiki/trunk/phase3/README?view=co).

But anyway, if any extensions above are dual (or triple et al) licenced, please
release the patch file under the same licence that those extensions have.
Comment 13 Raimond Spekking 2007-03-06 17:33:23 UTC
Applied with r20179 

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links