Last modified: 2006-11-13 07:59:02 UTC
$ u="http://radioscanningtw.jidanni.org/index.php?title=Mediawiki:Loginlanguagelinks&action=edit" $ lynx $u says "Bad HTML" -trace shows Bad HTML: TEXTAREA start tag not within FORM tag etc. $ validate $q *** Errors and warnings validating http://radioscanningtw.jidanni.org/index.php?title=Mediawiki:Loginl anguagelinks&action=edit: *** Error at line 129, character 13: there is no attribute "type" Error at line 129, character 23: element "STYLE" undefined
It's valid HTML: <http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fradioscanningtw.jidanni.org%2Findex.php%3Ftitle%3DMediawiki%3ALoginlanguagelinks%26action%3Dedit>. <textarea> is valid anywhere any inline element is valid: <http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd>. Atrribute "type" for <script> and element "style" are likewise standard, just rather newer than Lynx's HTML knowledge. So is there any reason for us to care that Lynx doesn't like our HTML? We aren't very well going to stop using stylesheets because Lynx doesn't like them.
