Last modified: 2012-12-19 11:33:24 UTC
* MediaWiki v1.8.2
* CategoryTree SVN version from 2006-10-15
When using this extension in MediaWiki:Sitenotice the box does show up, but is not usable. Clicking on [+] does
When including the <category> tag additionally into another page it works - also in the box shown from
Steps to reproduce:
1. Put <category>/some category/</category> into [[MediaWiki:Sitenotice]].
2. Box should be shown on all pages, but is infunctional.
3. Put the <category>/some category/</category> on any other page or visit [[MediaWiki:Sitenotice]] - two boxes
should be shown.
4. Both boxes will work.
5. Go to another page with box only included from [[MediaWiki:Sitenotice]] - box doesn't work.
browsers do not report them per default, you have to look for them in some log
and/or enable reporting).
code to be included, when it is in a system message. System messages are
special, using extensions in system messages is generally problematic.
I can't think of a good reason to use CategoryTree in the site notice... please
describe why you want that, perhaps I can find a better way to accomplish that goal.
into my skin. Ugly, but is the only way I think.
var categoryTreeCollapseMsg = "collapse";
var categoryTreeExpandMsg = "expand";
var categoryTreeLoadMsg = "load";
var categoryTreeLoadingMsg = "loading";
var categoryTreeNothingFoundMsg = "Lo sentimos, no se ha encontrado nada";
var categoryTreeNoSubcategoriesMsg = "sin subcategorías.";
var categoryTreeNoPagesMsg = "sin artículos ni subcategorías.";
>I can't think of a good reason to use CategoryTree in the site notice... please
>describe why you want that, perhaps I can find a better way to accomplish that
I want a CategoryTree menu into a div container in my own skin so I used
$this->html('sitenotice') variable to achieve this goal. Does you know better
way to accomplish that goal? Thanks.
You can get this to work using a relatively simple hack: [[Extension:CategoryTree#Using_CategoryTree_in_the_Sidebar]]
This should probably be come a propert configuration option in the future, so closing this as "LATER".
[Removing RESOLVED LATER as discussed in http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2012-November/064240.html . Reopening and setting priority to "Lowest". For future reference, please use either RESOLVED WONTFIX (for issues that will not be fixed), or simply set lowest priority. Thanks a lot!]