Last modified: 2008-08-11 18:11:47 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 7466 - Multiple <references> shouldn't print same ref multiple times
Multiple <references> shouldn't print same ref multiple times
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
Cite (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal enhancement with 5 votes (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2006-10-02 10:40 UTC by -jkb-
Modified: 2008-08-11 18:11 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description -jkb- 2006-10-02 10:40:56 UTC
I suggest to enable that references (made by < ref > can be placed on more
places on the page, e.g. in every section etc. When reference 1 and 2 in section
A, so I can recall them with < references / > here; but when I use this in the
section B (where there are references 3 and 4), so I will get all references on
the page, i.e. 1, 2, 3 and 4 (1 and 2 the second time). It would be useful that
those references, that has been recalled yet, do not appear the second time. ~~~~
Comment 1 Brion Vibber 2006-10-02 18:11:14 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 6271 ***
Comment 2 Aryeh Gregor (not reading bugmail, please e-mail directly) 2006-10-03 01:04:10 UTC
I believe the idea here is somewhat different than that of bug 6271:
<references> should (without any further arguments or whatnot) only print any
<ref>s since the last <references>, not any before that.  This would be handy
for something like [[Comparison of layout engines (CSS)]] (or most other enwiki
comparison pages), which tend to have per-section footnotes, although *why* they
do is a good question.

This would presumably also mean that ref numbering would be reset as well on
every <references>, although strictly that wouldn't be necessary.
Comment 3 -jkb- 2006-10-04 22:02:43 UTC
Yes, the idea is something else as 6271. Every time, when I set <references>, so
the "memory" of references should be deleted; but I do not think the numbering
should be resetted - no. Say, references (footnotes) 1 to 5 will be given in the
middle of the page, the rest, 6 to 10, on the end. It can make sense in long
articles. (Please do not mind my careful professional vocabulary of a profound
developer - I am not one :-)). 
Comment 4 Jelte (WebBoy) 2008-08-11 18:11:47 UTC
Fixed in r32290.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links