Last modified: 2006-08-29 19:01:28 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 7167 - References tag issues on wikipedia? (Multiple copies of one or more ref's??)
References tag issues on wikipedia? (Multiple copies of one or more ref's??)
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 7162
Product: Wikimedia
Classification: Unclassified
General/Unknown (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal normal (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stepped_...
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2006-08-29 18:55 UTC by Michael Gmirkin
Modified: 2006-08-29 19:01 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Michael Gmirkin 2006-08-29 18:55:42 UTC
I'm not quite sure exactly what is going on here.

The basic gist of it.

I used inline reference tags

ref & /ref

plus the references/ tag. I put two referenec links in there:

(http://amsglossary.allenpress.com/glossary/search?id=stepped-leader1 AMS
Glossary: Stepped Leader) 
(http://www.crh.noaa.gov/pub/?n=/ltg/ltg_what_is_it.php NOAA: What is Lightning?)

used the square brackets like I'm supposed to [ ]

Initially it worked okay, but then I thought it might look better with a comma
separating the references. That seems to have been when things got weird? Rather
than showing a one-line reference with 2 links on it, it showed two refernce
lines with two references on each line, and they were exact duplicates. So, I
took out the comma, but it still was duplicating the reference(s) on two lines.
So, I'm wondering what the problem was? OR did I misuse syntax somehow. I'm
almost wondering if maybe it didn't like the colons in the titles of the
references inside the square brackets or something? But why would that cause the
references to be displayed multiple times? Fially I had to ust putt the
references and add the references to Reference section manually rather than with
the ref & /ref tags.
Comment 1 Michael Gmirkin 2006-08-29 18:56:59 UTC
Might have added the titles for the references at the same time as the commas?
So, I'm wondering if maybe it was the colons in the titles in the reference link
brackets that was the problem? But why would that cause duplicate entries??
Comment 2 Aryeh Gregor (not reading bugmail, please e-mail directly) 2006-08-29 19:01:28 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 7162 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links