Last modified: 2006-08-31 16:48:51 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T9026, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 7026 - action=raw&templates=expand broken
action=raw&templates=expand broken
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
Parser (Other open bugs)
1.8.x
All All
: Normal normal with 1 vote (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?t...
: patch, patch-need-review
: 7028 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2006-08-16 00:21 UTC by Dan Li
Modified: 2006-08-31 16:48 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---

Attachments
patch for r16082 fixing templates=expand (662 bytes, patch)
2006-08-16 00:34 UTC, Dan Li 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Dan Li 2006-08-16 00:21:26 UTC 
templates=expand is broken on 1.8-svn and 1.7.1 (apparently I can only mark one
version though).

Wikipedia just gives me an empty page, but I'm assuming that's because error
reporting is turned off.

The problem, I think, is that Parser::mArgStack is not initialized when
Parser::replaceVariables is called on a new Parser instance.

Patch coming up.
Comment 1 Dan Li 2006-08-16 00:34:32 UTC 
Created attachment 2229 [details]
patch for r16082 fixing templates=expand

The patch fixes templates=expand, I think (using code from Tim Starling's
ExpandTemplates extension).

However, I haven't been able to test it as I haven't upgraded to 1.8-svn yet.
Comment 2 Dan Li 2006-08-16 00:36:35 UTC 
Do people actually search the bug database for "patch" and/or "need-review"?
Comment 3 Rob Church 2006-08-30 08:14:08 UTC 
*** Bug 7028 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Brion Vibber 2006-08-31 16:48:51 UTC 
Applied in r16304
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.

Navigation
Links