# Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 6636 - texvc produces misaligned math output for some tex commands
 Summary: texvc produces misaligned math output for some tex commands
 Status: Product: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 32694 MediaWiki extensions Unclassified Component: Math (Other open bugs) unspecified All Linux Low normal with 3 votes (vote) --- Nobody - You can work on this! patch, patch-need-review Show dependency tree / graph

 Reported: 2006-07-12 00:53 UTC by Michael Vanier 2014-09-23 22:41 UTC (History) 5 users (show) alsergbox cotton intnumerix p858snake random832 --- --- ---

Attachments
Changes to fix vertical alignment of png-rendered math formulas (16.25 KB, patch)
2009-11-07 05:15 UTC, Cotton Seed
Details

 Michael Vanier 2006-07-12 00:53:40 UTC This page: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Formula#Align_with_normal_text_flow says that the default settings of the mediawiki (monobook) stylesheet should give correctly centered math formulas when used inline in the middle of a sentence of normal wikitext. The example given does indeed center properly, but some other kinds of formulas do not. For instance: this formula: $2 \cdot 2 = 4$ renders about 15% below the text line (the dot is aligned with the bottom of the text line), which looks completely wrong. This can be fixed by putting font tags into the wikitext, but this is extremely tedious. Raimond Spekking 2007-05-25 07:37:13 UTC This is an texvc issue --> changing product/component Random832 2007-11-15 16:06:43 UTC [[w:en:User:Random832/Math baseline]] demonstrates a hypothetical fix using CSS vertical alignment (texvc would need to determine where the baseline is located in the image, and generate an appropriate pixel value for the vertical-align, to be applied via style="" to the img tag) Random832 2007-11-15 16:08:09 UTC The correct address is [[User:Random832/Math baseline]] - I'd assumed wikilinks were relative to meta rather than enwiki. Cotton Seed 2009-11-06 16:05:35 UTC I wrote a fix for this bug. Random832's suggestion is good (use vertical-align to set the baseline for math formulas rendered as images), but the question is: how do you compute the baseline? My idea is this: (1) underline the formula, on the baseline, in red, (2) write a tool invoked by texvc to find the underline (= baseline) in the image, and (3) call ImageMagick to strip out the underline in the final image, and (4) store the baseline in the math table for use when generating HTML linking to the image. The result looks really good. These changes are mixed with a bunch of others in a live wiki, but hopefully next week I'll have time to extract them and post diffs.  Cotton Seed 2009-11-07 05:15:02 UTC Created attachment 6757 [details] Changes to fix vertical alignment of png-rendered math formulas Here are my proposed changes. There is one thing I did not deal with properly: the program that computes the baseline uses libpng and is written in C. I added a naive target to math/Makefile to build it using gcc, but a proper, portable build script is beyond me. Maybe someone familiar with autoconf would be willing to contribute such a thing? Although, honestly, expecting gcc and libpng to be installed seems less onerous than expecting ocaml to be installed. Feedback welcome. Alexey Sergushichev 2010-03-23 18:26:47 UTC (In reply to comment #4) > I wrote a fix for this bug. Random832's suggestion is good (use vertical-align > to set the baseline for math formulas rendered as images), but the question is: > how do you compute the baseline? My idea is this: (1) underline the formula, > on the baseline, in red, (2) write a tool invoked by texvc to find the > underline (= baseline) in the image, and (3) call ImageMagick to strip out the > underline in the final image, and (4) store the baseline in the math table for > use when generating HTML linking to the image. > > The result looks really good. These changes are mixed with a bunch of others > in a live wiki, but hopefully next week I'll have time to extract them and post > diffs. There is a very simple way to compute baseline position. LaTeX has a standard package called preview http://www.gnu.org/software/auctex/manual/preview-latex.html#Package-options. If a formula is in preview section latex put information about baseline to dvi file. Then it can be extracted by dvipng with -depth option. Example: assaron@assaron:~/tmp$cat ex.tex \documentclass{article} \usepackage[displaymath,active]{preview} \begin{document} \thispagestyle{empty} \begin{preview}$a_{a_a}$\end{preview} \end{document} assaron@assaron:~/tmp$ latex ex.tex This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-1.40.10 (TeX Live 2009/Debian) restricted \write18 enabled. entering extended mode (./ex.tex LaTeX2e <2009/09/24> Babel and hyphenation patterns for english, usenglishmax, dumylang, noh yphenation, bulgarian, ukrainian, russian, loaded. (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/article.cls Document Class: article 2007/10/19 v1.4h Standard LaTeX document class (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/size10.clo)) (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/preview/preview.sty) (./ex.aux) Preview: Fontsize 10pt [1] (./ex.aux) ) Output written on ex.dvi (1 page, 280 bytes). Transcript written on ex.log. assaron@assaron:~/tmp\$ dvipng -T tight -depth ex.dvi This is dvipng 1.12 Copyright 2002-2008 Jan-Ake Larsson [1 depth=3] intnumerix 2011-02-10 15:21:32 UTC This bug is always open : some formulas are correctly aligned but with two or more in whole line, there is some misalignments... The solution found by Aleksey Sergushichev seems to be pretty. Can someone take care of this issue ? Brion Vibber 2012-03-02 00:42:46 UTC I'm duping this to bug 32694, where there's some work in progress using the preview package and -depth option on dvipng. This has a more recent patch, and I trust that method better than the pixel scan used in the original patch here. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 32694 *** Sumana Harihareswara 2012-03-02 00:43:39 UTC Cotton Seed -- just wanted to say, thanks for the patch.

 Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.