Last modified: 2010-05-15 15:56:47 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 6429 - Template Noincludes Show up in Sitenotice
Template Noincludes Show up in Sitenotice
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 4926
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
Parser (Other open bugs)
1.6.x
All All
: Normal normal (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
http://beta.theplaz.com/index.php?tit...
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2006-06-24 21:03 UTC by Michael
Modified: 2010-05-15 15:56 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Michael 2006-06-24 21:03:43 UTC
I have found that text placed in <noinclude> tags in templates will show up
anyway when transclued in the Sitenotice.  See my beta wiki for an example: 
http://beta.theplaz.com/index.php?title=MediaWiki:Sitenotice. 

You can see in the sitenotice on every page at beta.theplaz.com that the
noinclude text got transcluded anyway.  
My sitenotice calls http://beta.theplaz.com/index.php?title=Template:This_Template  

When I view the regular sitenotice page (MediaWiki:Sitenotice) the text in the
noinclude does not appear.  This way I know that I used the noinclude properly.
 I know I am using an old version of MW, but I searched and didn't see it fixed
in 1.6.7.

-Michael
http://theplaz.com
Comment 1 Brion Vibber 2006-06-24 21:05:36 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 4926 ***
Comment 2 Michael 2006-06-25 20:25:20 UTC
Opps.  Thanks :) Sorry about the duplicate.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links