Last modified: 2010-04-05 18:36:21 UTC
Hallo! Please compare http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Inline http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:INLINE http://epov.org/wd-gemet/index.php?title=Template:NSINLINE&action=edit [[{{foo}}bar]] fails to generate a link if {{foo}} renders to :bla or #bla the second and the third link show a workaround but how many templates should be required to be able to provide a clean *working* inline linking as suggested at Bug 2370: request for a <inline> ... </inline> extension best regards reinhardt [[user:gangleri]]
Oops! The seccond link should read http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:NSINLINE [[m:template_talk:NSINLINE]] Sorry!
Reproducable. At the same time, I'm not sure if this couldn't be considered the desired behaviour in most cases.
(In reply to comment #2) > Reproducable. At the same time, I'm not sure if this couldn't be considered the > desired behaviour in most cases. Sorry but I do not understand what is desired. a) See more examples about rendering to ':bla' and '#bla' at http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Inline#MediaZilla:05590_.2F_bugzilla:05590 rendering to ':bla' and '#bla' breaks both localurl and [external links]. b) I do not see any way to control list alignment via template output but maybe I am wrong. Please take a look at [[meta:template_talk:Inline#alignment_via_parameters]]. best regards reinhardt [[user:gangleri]] P.S. The scope of all this "bug reporting about inline syntax" is to be able to have *one* "clean" solution / alternative to design templates without lots of variants. There are both many templates that can be used with restrictions and other implementations using always the ":" and causing lots of comments.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 12974 ***
