Last modified: 2014-02-25 14:07:46 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 5589 - Special page to direct user to a random stub
Special page to direct user to a random stub
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
Special pages (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Lowest enhancement with 2 votes (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2006-04-15 21:20 UTC by MrZaius
Modified: 2014-02-25 14:07 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description MrZaius 2006-04-15 21:20:14 UTC
It'd be awsome if there was a special page that'd take you to a randomly
selected stub. I don't want to crawl through the inordinate amount of
interrelated categories to find something to work on. Most users probably have
something of value to add to ~20-25% of all stubs, and could just click through
the random link generator 4 or 5 times to find one.

A related bug:
http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2170

Please do not think this identical to 2170, however.  A special page that links
to a random stub would, ideally, go to any article with {{stub}}, rather than
any member of category stub.

I think this could be a greatly productive tool.

If fixed, please add mention to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Stub

Thanks!
Comment 1 MrZaius 2006-04-15 21:20:33 UTC
Also, SpecialPages should be updated, if this were added.
Comment 2 Rob Church 2006-04-29 20:17:48 UTC
I'd be more inclined to use the internal definition of stub, which is a page
with any length less than the user's stub threshold (set in preferences).
Comment 3 MrZaius 2006-05-22 20:53:31 UTC
>I'd be more inclined to use the internal definition of stub, which is a page
>with any length less than the user's stub threshold (set in preferences).

If that were done, would it still be possible to set up a template on the
wikipedia using existing features and syntax that'd go to a randomly selected
stub?  If so, how would I go about doing that?  If not, what's it take to make
the patch to Media Wiki?
Comment 4 Rob Church 2006-05-23 01:08:34 UTC
Since I'm not quite sure what comment 3 means, I can't answer.
Comment 5 Rob Church 2006-07-05 00:24:09 UTC
This one's going to require additional indexes on the page table; a bit of
experimentation shows that (using the French Wikipedia page table) a
straightforward random pages SELECT with an additional WHERE clause restricting
the length causes the operation to take some 13-15 seconds. That's forcing the
use of the existing page_random index.

Adding an index on ( page_random, page_len ) and forcing its use reduces the
time taken to about 3 seconds, but it's still quite expensive.

I think we have to look at how useful being able to select a random stub would
be. The report as filed gives us scope to adapt, however; most "stubs" on
Wikipedias are categorised when the little tags are added to them. If we
fulfilled bug 2170, that might be *better* for the cases desired here.
Comment 6 Rob Church 2007-01-15 09:59:53 UTC
Closing as WONTFIX in favour of fixing bug 2170, which is actually what the
original request really needed.
Comment 7 Helder 2014-02-25 14:07:28 UTC
FYI: You can use [[Special:RandomInCategory/Stubs]] now that bug 25931 was fixed.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links