Last modified: 2006-12-06 08:36:46 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 5485 - Diffs over multiple edits versus single edits not easily distinguished
Diffs over multiple edits versus single edits not easily distinguished
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 1616
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
History/Diffs (Other open bugs)
All All
: Normal normal with 1 vote (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
Depends on:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2006-04-07 02:32 UTC by emddudley
Modified: 2006-12-06 08:36 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Description emddudley 2006-04-07 02:32:51 UTC
There should be some note or other indication when one is viewing a diff over
multiple edits versus over a single edit.

When doing a diff over several revisions in an article's history, such as in the
provided URL, the diff view looks identical to a diff over a single edit. In the
provided diff URL, it appears that Naconkantari added nonsense to the article,
when in actuality there were several edits by other authors between the
revisions being compared.

This can be problematic because many people assume that links to diffs are for
only a single edit, unless otherwise informed.
Comment 1 tifego- 2006-04-12 05:35:44 UTC
Note that it's different editors, not different edits, that is the bigger problem; when all the edits in a row were by 
the same user, it might as well be one edit, but when other people edited in-between it can be misleading because the 
diff only shows the name of the last contributor.
Comment 2 tifego- 2006-04-29 09:11:54 UTC
My suggestion for fixing this is simple: Instead of saying

Naconkantari (Talk | contribs)

that edit diff should say

Naconkantari (Talk | contribs) and 3 others
Comment 3 Ilmari Karonen 2006-12-06 08:33:20 UTC
r18194 adds the number of intervening revisions to the diff view.  I have not
added the number of distinct editors, since I'd expect it to be harder on the
database, and the semantics are somewhat harder to define.  (Should the editors
of both of the endpoint revisions be excluded?  Only one?  Neither?)
Comment 4 Ilmari Karonen 2006-12-06 08:36:46 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 1616 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.