Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

As I commented at bug 53153 comment 1, I'm not sure adding parameters to index.php is the best approach here, particularly if their only purpose is to enhance on-wiki hacks.

(In reply to comment #1)
> As I commented at bug 53153 comment 1, I'm not sure adding parameters to
> index.php is the best approach here, particularly if their only purpose is to
> enhance on-wiki hacks.

I'm asking wpIgnoreBlankSummary=1 be adjusted to allow the user to click [Save page] without entering a Section Heading.  Anything above that, is gravy...

(In reply to comment #2)
> I'm asking wpIgnoreBlankSummary=1 be adjusted to allow the user to click
> [Save page] without entering a Section Heading.

Is this dependent on the user preference "Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary"? Have you tested with this user preference enabled/disabled?

What do you mean by "without entering a Section Heading"? Is the user disallowed or simply warned?

You can use nosummary= to suppress the summary box

(In reply to comment #4)
> You can use nosummary= to suppress the summary box

With section=new the summary box is replaced with a section heading/title box and nosummary=1 does not suppress the warning that there is a blank section heading.

Are you sure? nosummary also hide the summary on section=new (one of the most use cases, I think) and a hidden wpIgnoreBlankSummary is set on section=new and nosummary=1 which suppress the warning on save.

Can you provide steps to reproduce?

(In reply to comment #6)
> Are you sure? nosummary also hide the summary on section=new (one of the most
> use cases, I think) and a hidden wpIgnoreBlankSummary is set on section=new
> and nosummary=1 which suppress the warning on save.
> 
> Can you provide steps to reproduce?

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3AAutoWikiBrowser%2FCheckPage&diff=569755880&oldid=569696764

Was with

//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage&action=edit&section=new&preload=Wikipedia_talk:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage/PermissionRequest&summary=Requesting%20%5B%5BWP%3AAWB%7CAWB%5D%5D%20permissions&wpIgnoreBlankSummary=1&wpMinoredit=1&wpWatchthis=1&nosummary=1

Which although it didn't give me a warning, it also didn't apply the &summary=Requesting%20%5B%5BWP%3AAWB%7CAWB%5D%5D%20permissions and placed it at the bottom of the page under the "bots" section instead of inserting it at the bottom of the "users" section.  The purpose of this specifically is to add a button on that page that a user can click to open the edit window pre-filled in and all they have to do is click save to insert there name/request in the "users" section=2 for approval.

Other use cases would be to improve the "Submit this draft" buttons on the [[Template:AFC submission/draft]] and [[Template:AFC submission/declined]] templates where the ability to prepend the submission template to the top of section=0 is desired.

nosummary suppressed the summary field and therefore the summary for the revision. To have a summary at the revision you have to give a summary, but than that will be used as header.

You can add it with a header, when the preload contains a subst-ready template with the header text. That template will be subst on save and == == gets created.

(In reply to comment #8)
> nosummary suppressed the summary field and therefore the summary for the
> revision. To have a summary at the revision you have to give a summary, but
> than that will be used as header.
> 
> You can add it with a header, when the preload contains a subst-ready
> template with the header text. That template will be subst on save and
> == == gets created.

I'm sorry if I'm slow here, but the new post isn't suppose to have its own heading, it is suppose to be appended to the bottom of section=2 above section=3 and the edit should have a summary.