Last modified: 2010-05-15 15:38:19 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 5304 - Disable anonymous reading fails if you know a Wiki-URL
Disable anonymous reading fails if you know a Wiki-URL
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
User login and signup (Other open bugs)
1.5.x
PC Linux
: Normal critical (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2006-03-21 10:12 UTC by Christan Kindler
Modified: 2010-05-15 15:38 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Christan Kindler 2006-03-21 10:12:31 UTC
I want to prevent anonymous reading for our internal Wiki. 
As described in http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Preventing_Access my
LocalSettings.php file looks like this:
#$wgGroupPermissions = array();
#$wgWhitelistEdit = true;
#$wgWhitelistRead = array ("Special:Userlogin", "Wikipedia:Help");
$wgGroupPermissions['*'    ]['createaccount']   = false;
$wgGroupPermissions['*'    ]['read']            = fasle;
$wgGroupPermissions['*'    ]['edit']            = false;

Now, when you surf to the wiki index.php site everything looks as expected. But
if you know a wiki word and type it behind the url index.php/known_wiki_word the
reading restrection got lost and the user can read the internal wiki.
Comment 1 Rob Church 2006-03-21 13:03:10 UTC
Correct the spelling of "false" and uncomment the whitelist line.
Comment 2 Christan Kindler 2006-03-21 15:34:05 UTC
Sorry 1000 times for bothering you with that mistake!!!!
I didn't have seen that - realy.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links