Last modified: 2008-01-08 00:37:39 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 5265 - Add a footnotes tag similar to references
Add a footnotes tag similar to references
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 6271
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
Extensions requests (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal enhancement with 1 vote (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
:
: 11899 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2006-03-16 09:14 UTC by Andrew
Modified: 2008-01-08 00:37 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Andrew 2006-03-16 09:14:08 UTC
The <references> and <ref> tags have been amazing. However, on some articles,
I've seen people use these for footnotes instead of references, which is fine,
unless the article needs BOTH footnotes AND references. So what I suggest is a
separate <footnotes> and <note> tags, that will function very similarly to
references, though perhaps with a different rendering of the link, to make it
look different.
Comment 1 Michiel Sikma 2006-05-31 06:15:04 UTC
Yes. Please give this some priority. It would be a great improvement to some of
the better articles to be able to have two sections, I believe. Right now, it's
still possible to do so, but only with a deprecated template (because of the new
<ref> system).

It would be great if this were done!
Comment 2 cypsy 2008-01-08 00:20:42 UTC
*** Bug 11899 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 cypsy 2008-01-08 00:26:14 UTC
Copy of comment seen at m:Village pump (proposals):

> * The problem might be solved more elegantly/generically (and without more html tags) 
>   by categorizing refs with a pseudo-"class type". For example, one would have...
>    <ref class="n">... something in class "n" (e.g. a note)... </ref>
>    <ref class="x">... something in class "x" (e.g. some other category of ref)... </ref>
>    <ref>... something without a class (e.g. a regular citation)... </ref>
>    The balancing <references /> would look like this:
>    <references class="n" /> to dump all <ref>s with class="n".
>    <references class="x" /> to dump all <ref>s with class="x".
>    <references /&gt; to dump all <ref>s with no class.
>  This way, a page could have as many "notes" (or whatever) sections as necessary. 
>  For example, examples on a wiki help page.

> * Another option is to give <references/> a regex filter function:
>    <references name="n*" /> dumps all refs whose name= starts with 'n'
>    <references name="x*" /> dumps all refs whose name= starts with 'x'
>    <references name="[^nx]*" /> dumps the rest
>   This is however not suitable For refs that need different numbering schemes (e.g. notes vs citations).

> * One way to resolve the autonumbering problem would be to use an alpha prefix for the 
>   numbering, perhaps even using the first letter of the class name (or restricting the length of 
>   the class name to 1). 
>   Another way would be to give each group N numbers (e.g. 1000), so the default would be 1-999, 
>   the next 1001-1999 and so on.

> * The problem with using any autonumbering format except numbers and a-b-c is that Citephp depends 
>   on ordered lists (&lt;ol&gt; tag). Thus, while prefix + number (e.g. 'n1') would be the most flexible 
>   way to solve the autonumbering problem, it would require Citephp to emit CSS magic to simulate 
>   a numbered <ol>. It would still be ol (with list-style-type:none & hanging indent formatting), 
>   but the li's would need to provide numbering. Tables are another option.

> -- Fullstop (talk) 22:27, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
Comment 4 cypsy 2008-01-08 00:37:39 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 6271 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links