Last modified: 2013-06-14 21:22:52 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T51562, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 49562 - Special:Block should mention that user still has read access
Special:Block should mention that user still has read access
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
User blocking (Other open bugs)
1.22.0
All All
: Low trivial (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2013-06-14 02:53 UTC by Dan Jacobson
Modified: 2013-06-14 21:22 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Dan Jacobson 2013-06-14 02:53:00 UTC
Here is the current Special:Block wording:

Block user

Use the form below to block write access from a specific IP address or
username. This should be done only to prevent vandalism, and in
accordance with policy. Fill in a specific reason below (for example,
citing particular pages that were vandalized).

 	 Prevent account creation
 	 Automatically block the last IP address used by this user, and any subsequent IP addresses they try to edit from
 	 Watch this user's user and talk pages


What Special:Block needs to mention most:

Upon blocking, the user will no longer be able to *edit* any page[?] including
his own ... .
He will still be able to *read* ...
He will no be able to send ...
etc.
Comment 1 Dan Jacobson 2013-06-14 02:55:05 UTC
OK it mentions 'write access' but that's not enough details.
This is a serious action, so all ramifications need to be listed.
Comment 2 Dan Jacobson 2013-06-14 02:56:35 UTC
For instance Facebook blocks are different than MediaWiki blocks,
and MediaWiki has less users, so the onus is on MediaWiki to explain its different kind of blocks in more detail.
Comment 3 Dan Jacobson 2013-06-14 02:59:18 UTC
http://www.facebook.com/settings?tab=blocking shows the level of detail needed.
P.S., You need a Facebook account in order to see that page.
Comment 4 p858snake 2013-06-14 03:03:16 UTC
I'm not sure why you are comparing to facebook here?
Comment 5 Dan Jacobson 2013-06-14 03:15:22 UTC
I am worried that since so many people use Facebook,
they might somehow think the block involves read access too,
so you need to spell out clearly what MediaWiki blocks entail, before
the user click Submit.
Comment 6 Andre Klapper 2013-06-14 16:17:17 UTC
Removing "the most important stuff" from the bug summary as it's subjective and not descriptive. Also see https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/How_to_report_a_bug

Looking at http://www.facebook.com/settings?tab=blocking I see lots of things:
"Restricted List", "Block users", "Block app invites", "Block even invites", "Block apps".
Comment 7 Liangent 2013-06-14 16:34:51 UTC
btw. [[mw:Manual:$wgBlockDisablesLogin]].
Comment 8 Alex Monk 2013-06-14 21:22:52 UTC
This is silly. Saying 'write access' is enough. We should not have to clarify some things because another popular site works differently. Administrators in MediaWiki are expected to have a good idea about what a block does before they create one.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links