Last modified: 2014-06-16 09:05:04 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T51229, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 49229 - lucene support makes git.wikimedia.org slow
lucene support makes git.wikimedia.org slow
Status: NEW
Product: Wikimedia
Classification: Unclassified
Git/Gerrit (Other open bugs)
wmf-deployment
All All
: Lowest normal with 1 vote (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks: 49674
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2013-06-06 04:20 UTC by MZMcBride
Modified: 2014-06-16 09:05 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description MZMcBride 2013-06-06 04:20:03 UTC
Trying to browse around <https://git.wikimedia.org> this evening feels very slow. "time curl" seems to confirm the slowness:

$ time curl "https://git.wikimedia.org/summary/mediawiki%2Fcore.git"
real	0m13.733s
user	0m0.011s
sys	0m0.008s

I'm consistently getting times of 13s to 16s. :-/
Comment 1 Chad H. 2013-06-06 04:43:52 UTC
It is. I enabled the Lucene indexing to make the searches work, but performance took a nose-dive. Will be poking this tomorrow.
Comment 2 MZMcBride 2013-06-06 18:20:47 UTC
It seems much better now.
Comment 3 Chad H. 2013-06-06 18:28:13 UTC
I had to turn the lucene indexing off for the time being until I can figure out why it sucks so much.
Comment 4 p858snake 2013-06-17 13:26:18 UTC
*** Bug 49674 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Andre Klapper 2014-03-13 13:01:37 UTC
(In reply to Chad H. from comment #3)
> I had to turn the lucene indexing off for the time being until I can figure
> out why it sucks so much.

Chad: I assume Lucene indexing is still off? In that case, should this ticket be turned into an enhancement request to enable Lucene indexing?
Comment 6 Andre Klapper 2014-06-15 21:20:54 UTC
(In reply to Chad H. from comment #3)
> I had to turn the lucene indexing off for the time being until I can figure
> out why it sucks so much.

Chad / Nik: I assume Lucene indexing is still off? In that case, should this ticket be turned into an enhancement request to enable Lucene indexing, with lower priority?
Comment 7 Chad H. 2014-06-16 02:19:41 UTC
(In reply to Andre Klapper from comment #6)
> (In reply to Chad H. from comment #3)
> > I had to turn the lucene indexing off for the time being until I can figure
> > out why it sucks so much.
> 
> Chad / Nik: I assume Lucene indexing is still off? In that case, should this
> ticket be turned into an enhancement request to enable Lucene indexing, with
> lower priority?

Yes, it's off. I doubt I'll ever revisit getting it back on. WONTFIX?

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links