Last modified: 2006-02-03 08:08:04 UTC
Fatal error: Undefined class name 'revision' in /home/myseattl/public_html/mediawiki/extensions/SpamBlacklist/SpamBlacklist_body.php on line 174 Using MediaWiki (http://wikipedia.sf.net/): 1.4.4 PHP (http://www.php.net/): 4.3.11 (apache) MySQL (http://www.mysql.com/): 4.0.25-standard I modified line 171 from this: if ( $dbr->tableExists( 'page' ) ){ to this: if ( $dbr->tableExists( 'page' ) && class_exists('Revision') ){ Please add a patch to the sourceforge version. http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/wikipedia/extensions/SpamBlacklist/SpamBlacklist_body.php?rev=1.17&view=log = John Walling http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Jwalling
MediaWiki 1.4 doesn't have a page table, so this shouldn't ever come up.
It should never come up, and yet it did. Please explain.(In reply to comment #1) > MediaWiki 1.4 doesn't have a page table, so this shouldn't ever come up. The patch for forking between schema 1.5 and 1.4 causes a fatal error as it is designed in the current version. Even though the page table doesn't exist in 1.4, the logic flows up to the point where a fatal error occurs because the class 'Revision' doesn't exist. How can you say something is not an issue when a fatal error saying "Hell no! I'm not executing this code"? = John Walling
a) What is "forking between schema 1.5 and 1.4"? b) The code you quoted above will always evaluate to false if there is not a 'page' table. If there is not a page table, you're running 1.4 or earlier and there is no Revision class either. If there is a page table, either you are running 1.5 or later, and you have a Revision class, or something is damaged about your installation. So, is your installation damaged or is there something else wrong?
(In reply to comment #3) > a) What is "forking between schema 1.5 and 1.4"? > > b) The code you quoted above will always evaluate to false if there is > not a 'page' table. If there is not a page table, you're running 1.4 or > earlier and there is no Revision class either. If there is a page table, > either you are running 1.5 or later, and you have a Revision class, or > something is damaged about your installation. > > So, is your installation damaged or is there something else wrong? > If you say it's damaged it must be damaged. I got the code working with my patch so nothing else is at issue. Cancel the bug report. = John Walling
