Last modified: 2006-01-31 20:55:26 UTC
Since editors are left to their own devices to add categories, other languages, interwiki links at the foot of pages, this area is more often than not untidy (if not tangled or not even at the very bottom of a page). Suggest that editors are offered (the option to reveal) fields like the "Edit summary field" between the main editing area and the Edit summary field, in which they may add category / other language / interwiki / stub / etc names, e.g. ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │Main editing area (not to scale!) │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ ┌───────────────────────────────┐ Categories: │ │ └───────────────────────────────┘ ┌───────────────────────────────┐ Other languages: │ │ └───────────────────────────────┘ ┌───────────────────────────────┐ Interwiki: │ │ └───────────────────────────────┘ ┌───────────────────────────────┐ Stub: │ │ └───────────────────────────────┘ ┌───────────────────────────────┐ Edit summary: │ │ └───────────────────────────────┘ So as not to scare novice editors, I'd make the Category, Other languages and Interwiki fields revealable on demand. The software could then remove any "[[Category:...]]", "[[{lang}:...]]", "{Interwiki..}" added in the main editing area (perhaps with warning to user) and instead parse entries added in the new fields (e.g. if "2001 establishments, Encyclopedias, Wikipedia" already appeared in the Categories field, adding "Spoken articles, " at the start or ", Spoken articles" elsewhere would result in the addition of [[Category:Spoken articles]], etc.) I'd willingly volunteer to try coding this, except I know I don't have the relevant knowledge. Have I touched a nerve with anyone else on this? I feel this (and the implementation of an "archive" tab beside those along the top of pages) would make a significant improvement to consistency. Apologies if all this has already been suggested; it was not readily apparent from a scan through the results of a search. Yours hopefully, David Kernow
Looks like I should've used to create the diagram above. Apologies.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 167 ***