Last modified: 2011-10-12 01:16:47 UTC
The contents of LanguagePl.php in CVS currently aren't in sync with the translated messages used on the Polish Wikipedia (http://pl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Specjalna:Allmessages&ot=php). I udpated the LanguagePl.php file and sorted the new messages so that they are in a more or less logical order. I'm attaching a diff generated against v1.75.
Created attachment 1276 [details] Diff against v1.75
Beware, there is some reference to wikipedia / wikimedia in the above patch. For examples the addLoadEvent() LinkFA() functions in monobook.js and the boardvote stuff. Cann you clean those and resubmit the patch ? Thanks!
HEAD got some cleanup today, marking as invalid until proper patch. Once we got the unrelated stuff out of them, we are being more strict to not put it back.
Created attachment 1369 [details] Diff against v1.1
I've just attached an updated patch. I think I removed all Wikipedia-specific stuff this time. The messages are now sorted in alphabetical order, which should make future updates like this one a little easier.
Really? Doesn't look like so: +'copyrightpagename' => 'prawami autorskimi Wikipedii',
Created attachment 1396 [details] Diff against v1.2 What I meant by Wikipedia-specific stuff were array entries not even present in the English messages file (such as 'boardvote*') but used in the Polish Wikipedia. This updated patch also removes all *references* to Wikipedia in the messages.
Umm, still some things: copyrightwarning mentions GFDL ... 'showhideminor' => '$1 drobne zmiany', compare to 'showhideminor' => "$1 minor edits | $2 bots | $3 logged in users | $4 patrolled edits", ... prefsnologintext doesn't use wiki markup ... 'privacypage' => 'wikimedia:Zasady_ochrony_prywatności', ... 'sitesubtitle' => 'Wolna encyklopedia', ... 'sitesupport-url' => 'Wikimedia:Dary pieniężne', It is not guaranteed to be a complete list. Note also that output from allmessages from wikimedia wiki is not the preferred way to do general translations for MediaWiki.
Is an updated patch against SVN HEAD forthcoming?
Evidently not.
