Last modified: 2005-12-20 15:02:20 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 4217 - firstHeading class
firstHeading class
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
Parser (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2005-12-08 02:12 UTC by Brian Jason Drake
Modified: 2005-12-20 15:02 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Brian Jason Drake 2005-12-08 02:12:58 UTC
<h1 class="firstHeading">(pagetitle)</h1>

Why not call the class "pageTitle" to reflect what the class is used for? This class 
does not appear to be used anywhere else.
Comment 1 Brion Vibber 2005-12-08 02:15:34 UTC
No reason to change it; it is the first heading.
Comment 2 Brian Jason Drake 2005-12-08 02:57:26 UTC
It's true that it's the first heading, but it would be nice to know a bit more 
when looking at the CSS; also, it might not always be the first heading (we might 
make the first heading the site title and this the second heading).
Comment 3 Brian Jason Drake 2005-12-08 03:03:27 UTC
You resolved the bug without giving an explanation.
Comment 4 Brion Vibber 2005-12-08 03:07:10 UTC
There's no issue here.
Comment 5 Rob Church 2005-12-08 07:49:49 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> (we might make the first heading the site title and this the second heading).

...in which case we'd update the CSS and any affected output to reflect it.

Comment 6 Brian Jason Drake 2005-12-09 01:02:28 UTC
This seems unnecessarily complicated.
Comment 7 Rob Church 2005-12-09 07:56:00 UTC
No, *this* is an unnecessary waste of *our* time. We've done things how we've
done them for a reason. A lot of the bug reports you've been filing aren't
actual bug reports, but comments on our SGML or some other trivial detail that
isn't broken. Obviously, I don't want to put you off filing genuine bug reports,
making genuine comments and trying to be helpful, but persistently commenting on
every little quirk MediaWiki has is going to sap up your energies, as it is.
Please restrict what you create to being proper bug reports or feature requests.
Comment 8 Brian Jason Drake 2005-12-20 04:59:56 UTC
It's only trivial if you think it's trivial. Isn't this why we have a severity 
of "trivial" and a priority of "lowest"?
Comment 9 Rob Church 2005-12-20 15:02:20 UTC
(In reply to comment #8)
> It's only trivial if you think it's trivial. Isn't this why we have a severity 
> of "trivial" and a priority of "lowest"?

Those are for things that are actually broken and need fixing, but aren't vital.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links