Last modified: 2006-04-02 04:17:43 UTC
Halló! It is not obvious that http://bg.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=%D0%B3%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BC%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B0&redirect=no shows a blue link to a *redirect*. This is a double redirects. There are hundered of them, see http://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=Special:DoubleRedirects&limit=500&offset=0 requirement / proposal: &redirect=no should mark redirects distinctly (doubl, multiple redirects and redirects to itself). This would make it possible to identify these situations without klicking on the link. There have been many related / similar requirements: - bug 2318: Special:Allpages should mark redirects distinctly see bug comment 7 see bug 2872: Redirect links on Special:Watchlist bug 759: Distinguish redirects on the watchlist editing page its duplicate: bug 2640: Mark redirects on watchlist edit bug 2814: Special:Disambiguations issues (interface strings, redirects) bug 2902: show all redirects to a page on the targets Special:Whatlinkshere if last contains more then (limit - 500?) links - bug 3897: redirects to itself show now as blue links; they should not best regards reinhardt user:gangleri
This would require an extra query, and you can find these with Special:Disambiguations.
