Last modified: 2005-11-07 09:47:35 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T5900, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 3900 - allow administrators to see registered users in an IP's contributions
allow administrators to see registered users in an IP's contributions
Status: CLOSED WORKSFORME
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
History/Diffs (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Low enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2005-11-07 05:21 UTC by wiki.pedia.WiseFool
Modified: 2005-11-07 09:47 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description wiki.pedia.WiseFool 2005-11-07 05:21:29 UTC
I can only assume that this feature doesn't exist already, since I've seen
"Despite this IP being a proxy, there have been no valid edits in the past 3
weeks to warrant this IP not being blocked." and "This IP continues to post
nothing but vandalism.", when I myself was contributing from that IP while being
logged in. Since it wouldn't be secure to just have everyone be able to see who
uses an IP address, this would have to be limited to administrators or sysops,
but it's valuable information in determining how long an IP should be blocked.
Of course, the need for such might be made obsolete if bug 3899 becomes fixed,
but it's still useful.
Comment 1 Brion Vibber 2005-11-07 05:42:57 UTC
This is what CheckUser does, and as it's considered a serious privacy 
breech to let just anyone check that it's currently very tightly 
restricted. Check around on the wiki for existing discussion on this tool.
Comment 2 Rob Church 2005-11-07 07:47:04 UTC
As an example, some users on the English Wikipedia tried to implement a policy
change recently which, had it all gone their way, would have effectively allowed
Stewards to grant CheckUser access to individual members of the community in a
"requests for CheckUser"-type process. This was shot down on several levels.
Comment 3 wiki.pedia.WiseFool 2005-11-07 09:47:07 UTC
Ah. So it's just a power that an extremely few people (T.S., D.G., and some
stewards) possess. That's understandable.
So I guess a solution would have to be a policy of requesting a CheckUser on an
IP before a particularly long block is put in place, to see if there are any
registered users contributing positively through that proxy, so as to avoid
assertions like "This IP posts nothing but vandalism."
Comment 4 wiki.pedia.WiseFool 2005-11-07 09:47:35 UTC
Ah. So it's just a power that an extremely few people (T.S., D.G., and some
stewards) possess. That's understandable.
So I guess a solution would have to be a policy of requesting a CheckUser on an
IP before a particularly long block is put in place, to see if there are any
registered users contributing positively through that proxy, so as to avoid
assertions like "This IP posts nothing but vandalism."

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links