Last modified: 2011-03-13 18:06:04 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 374 - Import log pages to logging table on upgrade
Import log pages to logging table on upgrade
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
Installer (Other open bugs)
1.5.x
All All
: Lowest enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2004-09-03 22:06 UTC by Brion Vibber
Modified: 2011-03-13 18:06 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Brion Vibber 2004-09-03 22:06:06 UTC
1.4 now uses a logging table instead of funky wiki pages to log uploads, deletions, etc. When upgrading a 
wiki, the data in the log pages should be imported into the logging table insofar as possible, and perhaps 
the old pages redirected to the appropriate Special:Log section.

There's a partial import script in maintenance, it needs to be finished up before release and an updater 
added to the set.
Comment 1 Brion Vibber 2005-03-27 02:22:21 UTC
1.4.0 released; kicking back to 1.5 blockers.
Comment 2 Brion Vibber 2005-04-22 12:26:07 UTC
Reassigning to enhancements.
Comment 3 Rob Church 2006-12-03 12:43:09 UTC
Not sure how much of an issue this still is. I would *hope* that most of the
pre-1.4 wikis have now been upgraded, at least to the 1.5 or 1.6 branches. The
log table itself has been used in MediaWiki for about four release cycles
now...it *might* be best to let this one fade into the ether?
Comment 4 Brion Vibber 2006-12-04 19:23:02 UTC
Probably not worth the bother.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links