Last modified: 2006-12-22 05:08:38 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T5739, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 3739 - monobook.js incorrectly appears in category
monobook.js incorrectly appears in category
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
Categories (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Low normal with 1 vote (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category...
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2005-10-18 21:48 UTC by David Benbennick
Modified: 2006-12-22 05:08 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description David Benbennick 2005-10-18 21:48:47 UTC
[[User:BrokenSegue/monobook.js]] contains the string "{{unverified}}".  
Although no category links appear at the bottom of the page, it does appear 
in the category listing at [[Category:Images with unknown source]].
Comment 1 Aryeh Gregor (not reading bugmail, please e-mail directly) 2006-12-03 18:20:59 UTC
Why is this incorrect?
Comment 2 Rotem Liss 2006-12-03 18:22:27 UTC
Anyway, it seems to be a specific problem which is not exist anymore.
Comment 3 Seb35 2006-12-06 21:41:30 UTC
I reopen this bug because it still exist, although it don't appear in 
the category given in the example.

A new example is [[fr:Catégorie:\',\']], with the monobook.js of the 
user EvHart, which appears in this category because he has written in 
his monobook [[Catégorie:\',\']] in a script. There were other examples 
in some categories.
Comment 4 Seb35 2006-12-06 21:48:53 UTC
The example I give is a bit different because it's a category and the 
original problem is with a template, but it's the same problem. With a 
template an example is [[w:fr:Catégorie:Orthographe à vérifier]].
Comment 5 Aryeh Gregor (not reading bugmail, please e-mail directly) 2006-12-07 03:25:58 UTC
[[User:Lupin]] asks people to add a link in a comment when they copy a script,
so he can keep track of them via Whatlinkshere.  Possibly this behavior is
desirable?
Comment 6 Rob Church 2006-12-07 03:47:30 UTC
I would consider it desirable behaviour; being able to track use of scripts,
etc. is useful for maintenance and locating problems.

If it's causing *stupid* categorisations, then use it split across two strings,
concatenated in the script.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links