Last modified: 2004-09-03 22:56:49 UTC
BUG MIGRATED FROM SOURCEFORGE http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=779369&group_id=34373&atid=411192 Originally submitted by saurabh asthana (skronyonyo) 2003-07-29 06:35 If you have a page where the first thing is a header, two "[edit]" section links will appear atop the page, side-by-side. One will edit a blank section. see <a href=http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Capitalism>Talk:Capitalism</a> for an example. Saurabh ------------------------- Additional comments ------------------------ Date: 2003-08-06 01:46 Sender: SF user vibber The first link is for the introduction section, which indeed is blank. It's not a bug, but it is ugly. :) Lowering priority. ------------------------------------------------- Date: 2003-08-12 02:46 Sender: SF user skronyonyo It's not clear to me why we would want section editing on talk pages anyway... can they be disabled for talk namespaces? ------------------------------------------------- Date: 2003-08-12 02:56 Sender: SF user vibber Actually, talk pages are one of the places where section editing is *most* useful. Consider the Village Pump as a communal talk page; long talk pages on controversial articles are also very difficult to handle. Using sections (now even easier with the "post a comment" button on talk pages) makes them a lot easier to handle. ------------------------------------------------- Date: 2003-08-12 06:47 Sender: SF user vibber Actually, talk pages are one of the places where section editing is *most* useful. Consider the Village Pump as a communal talk page; long talk pages on controversial articles are also very difficult to handle. Using sections (now even easier with the "post a comment" button on talk pages) makes them a lot easier to handle.
Expected behaviour.
