Last modified: 2012-10-17 04:24:01 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T34799, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 32799 - Feedback Dashboard needs an option to hide comments from editors
Feedback Dashboard needs an option to hide comments from editors
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
MoodBar (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Unprioritized enhancement with 1 vote (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2011-12-04 22:24 UTC by Matthew Bowker
Modified: 2012-10-17 04:24 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Matthew Bowker 2011-12-04 22:24:30 UTC 
Recently, there's been a slight problem with lewd and inappropriate feedback in [[Special:FeedbackDashboard]] on the English Wikipedia, for example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:FeedbackDashboard/9295 , http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:FeedbackDashboard/9292 , http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:FeedbackDashboard/9282 (hidden by administrative action) , and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:FeedbackDashboard/9238 .  Now, administrators can remove comments, but would it be possible to add the option for normal editors to suppress comments?  The suppressed comments would go to a "suppression queue" where oversighters can review the suppressed comments and act on them.
Comment 1 Sam Reed (reedy) 2011-12-04 23:29:49 UTC 
Seriously? It'd make much more sense to have users be able to do it (autoconfirmed? Or just a new user group), having them into a queue is just pointless excess work
Comment 2 Matthew Bowker 2011-12-05 05:21:30 UTC 
(In reply to comment #1)
> Seriously? It'd make much more sense to have users be able to do it
> (autoconfirmed? Or just a new user group), having them into a queue is just
> pointless excess work

I agree that makes more sense.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.

Navigation
Links