Last modified: 2010-05-15 15:32:55 UTC
When I enter this in mediawiki (german): ========= Test1 [[Bild:Test.JPG|thumb]] Test2 ========= I get this output: <!-- start content --> <p>Test1 </p> <div class="thumb tright"><div style="width<a href=":182px class='external' rel="nofollow">:182px</a>;"><a href="/wiki/index.php/Bild<a href=":Test.JPG class='external' rel="nofollow">:Test.JPG</a>" class="internal" title=""><img src="/wiki/images/thumb/0/05/180px-Test.JPG" alt="" width="180" height="120" longdesc="/wiki/index.php/Bild<a href=":Test.JPG class='external' rel="nofollow">:Test.JPG</a>" /></a> <div class="thumbcaption" ><div class="magnify" style="float<a href=":right class='external' rel="nofollow">:right</a>"><a href="/wiki/index.php/Bild<a href=":Test.JPG class='external' rel="nofollow">:Test.JPG</a>" class="internal" title="vergrößern"><img src="/wiki/skins/common/images/magnify-clip.png" width="15" height="11" alt="vergrößern" /></a></div></div></div></div> <p>Test2 </p><div class="printfooter"> Von "<a href="http://xyz.de/wiki/index.php/Seite2">http://xyz.de/wiki/index.php/Seite2</a>"</div> <!-- end content --> Theese additional colons are destroying the layout
Weuh! Your wiki appears to be interpretting every occurrence of ":" as though it were an external link - seemingly as though ":" were a valid 'protocol' prefix, like "http://", "mailto:", etc. Thus "width:182px" becomes "width<a href=":182px">:182px</a>" (with some extra floweryness), and so on wherever ":" appears. (The mismatched "s may be your browser trying to make sense of the HTML as it processes it) Have you made any changes to the code, or made any "unusual" changes in LocalSettings.php? Can you replicate this problem on any other wiki? What happens if you just type "Bild:Test.JPG", or for that matter ":test"? (i.e. does this happen only within the image markup, or to the wikitext generally?)
I'm going to resolve this bug (as "WORKSFORME") on the grounds that without further details of the circumstances in which it occurs, there's really not much we can do - and since you used a throwaway e-mail address, I'm not convinced that such details are forthcoming. If you do actually come back and read these replies, feel free to reopen the bug with more details, and my apologies if this seems impatient of me.
