Last modified: 2011-08-13 15:44:40 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T30893, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 28893 - Proofread Page extension needs an API module to retrieve page status
Proofread Page extension needs an API module to retrieve page status
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
ProofreadPage (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal normal (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: John Du Hart
: patch, patch-need-review
Depends on:
Blocks: noncoreapi
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2011-05-09 15:18 UTC by MZMcBride
Modified: 2011-08-13 15:44 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---

Attachments
ApiQuery prop module (3.18 KB, patch)
2011-08-08 17:51 UTC, John Du Hart 		Details
Improved patch (4.24 KB, patch)
2011-08-09 22:04 UTC, John Du Hart 		Details
Show Obsolete (1) Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description MZMcBride 2011-05-09 15:18:31 UTC 
The Proofread Page extension (<http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Proofread_Page>) needs an API module to allow users to retrieve the current status of a page (without text, problematic, etc.)
Comment 1 Mark A. Hershberger 2011-05-20 15:54:08 UTC 
I would love something like this since (I think) I could use it to build my reCaptcha clone.
Comment 2 John Du Hart 2011-08-08 17:51:10 UTC 
Created attachment 8897 [details]
ApiQuery prop module

Eh. I'm not sure if a FauxRequest and/or relying on the categories is the best route to go here (Pulling down an entire rev to run a regex seems wasteful when you have the categories). I need to ask Roan if running the API again internally is the right way.
Comment 3 John Du Hart 2011-08-09 22:04:54 UTC 
Created attachment 8901 [details]
Improved patch

Roan and reedy confirmed this method was fine. Also added a namespace check and docs. I'll document this in my user space and put it on the extension page when it goes live.
Comment 4 Sam Reed (reedy) 2011-08-13 15:44:40 UTC 
Thanks

r94418
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.

Navigation
Links