Last modified: 2011-05-01 11:39:39 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T30763, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 28763 - Hard redirects activation on fr.wikibooks
Hard redirects activation on fr.wikibooks
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Product: Wikimedia
Classification: Unclassified
Site requests (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Unprioritized major (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
: shell
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2011-04-30 23:55 UTC by JackPotte
Modified: 2011-05-01 11:39 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description JackPotte 2011-04-30 23:55:48 UTC
Hello,

We've decided to ask you to activate the hard redirects (with the syntax [[wikipedia:xxx]] as in the software Mediawiki downloaded) on fr.wikibooks, just because the ingredients of our cooking book are described on Wikipedia.
So we don't to duplicate their definitions.

Consensus: http://fr.wikibooks.org/wiki/Discussion_utilisateur:Sub#Livre_de_cuisine.2FIngr.C3.A9dients.

The severity is major because we've got hundreds of links toward them.

The security of the unwanted redirections will be assured thanks to patrolled edit.

Thank you.
Comment 1 Roan Kattouw 2011-05-01 08:18:47 UTC
Looks like $wgDisableHardRedirects = false; will accomplish this.

It's currently only set to false on foundationwiki per bug 25422. This is a fishbowl wiki, and I'm not quite sure what the security implications are of enabling hard redirects on a non-fishbowl wiki (aside from obvious things like pranksters redirecting things to Special:Userlogout).
Comment 2 JackPotte 2011-05-01 09:44:24 UTC
The sysops can already do the worst security editions by modifying the common or individual .js. So I can't see any new policy brings by these redirections.
Comment 3 p858snake 2011-05-01 09:55:38 UTC
Is this really needed? apart from the possibly security vectors that roan pointed out, is it that hard to use interwiki links in the article text compared to creating local pages that redirect to them?
Comment 4 JackPotte 2011-05-01 10:09:23 UTC
OK, let's cancel, we'll choose the B plan: redirect from one ingredient to a category using it in a recipe.
Comment 5 Krinkle 2011-05-01 11:39:39 UTC
Changing to INVALID, since the ticket opener has canceled the request.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links