Last modified: 2013-04-12 23:04:33 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T30361, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 28361 - mwlib does not support “xg” format in #time
mwlib does not support “xg” format in #time
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
Collection (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal normal with 1 vote (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
http://test.wikipedia.org/w/index.php...
:
: 41748 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2011-04-01 13:27 UTC by Mormegil
Modified: 2013-04-12 23:04 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Mormegil 2011-04-01 13:27:56 UTC
When an article using {{#time: xg}} is rendered into PDF, the specifier is understood as “literal ‘x’ + hour in 12-hour format, not zero-padded”, but “xg” is a specifier for “the full month name in the genitive form for site languages that distinguish between genitive and nominative forms” (see http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Extension:ParserFunctions#.23time).
Comment 1 Bugmeister Bot 2011-08-19 19:12:31 UTC
Unassigning default assignments. http://article.gmane.org/gmane.science.linguistics.wikipedia.technical/54734
Comment 2 Mormegil 2013-04-12 22:19:43 UTC
*** Bug 41748 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Mormegil 2013-04-12 22:37:49 UTC
It seems the bug has been fixed. This is probably due to the change in mwlib where mwlib now fetches the article text using action=expandtemplates because of Scribunto (Lua) support (see bug 45861).
Comment 4 Bartosz Dziewoński 2013-04-12 23:04:33 UTC
RESOLVED WORKSFORME it is, then.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links