Last modified: 2011-05-03 16:44:11 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T30177, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 28177 - Update feedback extension on the wmf cluster
Update feedback extension on the wmf cluster
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Product: Wikimedia
Classification: Unclassified
Extension setup (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
http://en.wikinews.org
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2011-03-22 01:40 UTC by Monomium
Modified: 2011-05-03 16:44 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Monomium 2011-03-22 01:40:13 UTC
Could the developers update the article feedback extension on the English Wikinews to the new one used on the English Wikipedia?

The four labels would be as follows:
*Reliability
*Completeness       
*Neutrality       
*Presentation

See http://mediawiki.org/Article_Feedback for info on the new version.

Thanks!
Comment 1 Aaron Schulz 2011-03-25 01:07:10 UTC
You can't really "update" from one to the other. The older one will be ditched and replaced with it's successor. Data (very) likely won't carry over though.
Comment 2 Monomium 2011-03-25 04:03:45 UTC
Could a dev confirm that the data will be gone?
Comment 3 Aaron Schulz 2011-03-25 04:06:59 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> Could a dev confirm that the data will be gone?

It doesn't have to be erased. enwikinews and enwiki are using two different extensions (one is the successor of the other). They use different DB tables. The old tables from the old extension could still be kept of course.
Comment 4 p858snake 2011-03-25 04:37:48 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > Could a dev confirm that the data will be gone?
> 
> It doesn't have to be erased. enwikinews and enwiki are using two different
> extensions (one is the successor of the other). They use different DB tables.
> The old tables from the old extension could still be kept of course.

How hard would it be to write a migration script? how differnt are the db layouts?
Comment 5 Trevor Parscal 2011-03-28 16:58:39 UTC
The data carrying over is not even useful. The newest version of the tool uses different categories, so the data doesn't really carry over properly anyways. Just dump your article_feedback* tables for your own statistical analysis and move on. The most recent version of the ArticleFeedback extension actually expires ratings (a feature that was part of the original design but implemented later on) making them especially ephemeral, so I wouldn't worry too much about the rating data aside from getting a dump of it.
Comment 6 Krinkle 2011-05-03 16:43:46 UTC
This bug doesn't appear to be relevant anymore.

The Article feedback tool has been further improved, and deployment of version 3 is scheduled.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links