Last modified: 2011-04-08 15:31:17 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T30122, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 28122 - Path fragmenting results in all paths having the same modified property
Path fragmenting results in all paths having the same modified property
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
CodeReview (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: High normal (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2011-03-19 21:34 UTC by Sam Reed (reedy)
Modified: 2011-04-08 15:31 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Sam Reed (reedy) 2011-03-19 21:34:23 UTC
Comment:	Tag for version 0.4.1
Modified paths:	
/ (added)
/tags (added)
/tags/extensions (added)
/tags/extensions/SemanticInternalObjects (added)
/tags/extensions/SemanticInternalObjects/REL_0_4_1 (added)


Comment:	Per Jarry1250 on IRC: fix for r81469: accept StubObject in Message::inLanguage(); was breaking api.php?action=query&meta=allmessages
Modified paths:	
/ (modified) (diff)
/trunk (modified) (diff)
/trunk/phase3 (modified) (diff)
/trunk/phase3/includes (modified) (diff)
/trunk/phase3/includes/Message.php (modified) (diff)


Comment:	deleting erroneously created directory
Modified paths:	
/ (deleted)
/tags (deleted)
/tags/extensions (deleted)
/tags/extensions/SemanticFormsInputs (deleted)
/tags/extensions/SemanticFormsInputs/REL_0_4_1 (deleted)
/tags/extensions/SemanticFormsInputs/REL_0_4_1/SemanticFormsInputs (deleted)



Will poke at it later
Comment 1 Sam Reed (reedy) 2011-03-19 21:41:08 UTC
Part of this will be the path repopulation...

On newer improted revs, it seems to be alright...

This might actually be a WONTFIX..? As working out what was already there (unless it's common or below?), would need to have a modified status

Comment:	releasing version 0.4.1
Modified paths:	
/ (added)
/tags (added)
/tags/extensions (added)
/tags/extensions/SemanticFormsInputs (added)
/tags/extensions/SemanticFormsInputs/REL_0_4_1 (added)
/tags/extensions/SemanticFormsInputs/REL_0_4_1/COPYING (added)
/tags/extensions/SemanticFormsInputs/REL_0_4_1/README (added)
/tags/extensions/SemanticFormsInputs/REL_0_4_1/SFI_Inputs.php (added)
/tags/extensions/SemanticFormsInputs/REL_0_4_1/SFI_Settings.php (added)
/tags/extensions/SemanticFormsInputs/REL_0_4_1/SemanticFormsInputs (deleted)
/tags/extensions/SemanticFormsInputs/REL_0_4_1/SemanticFormsInputs.i18n.php (added)
/tags/extensions/SemanticFormsInputs/REL_0_4_1/SemanticFormsInputs.php (added)
/tags/extensions/SemanticFormsInputs/REL_0_4_1/SemanticFormsInputs/COPYING (deleted)
/tags/extensions/SemanticFormsInputs/REL_0_4_1/SemanticFormsInputs/README (deleted)
/tags/extensions/SemanticFormsInputs/REL_0_4_1/SemanticFormsInputs/SFI_Inputs.php (deleted)
/tags/extensions/SemanticFormsInputs/REL_0_4_1/SemanticFormsInputs/SFI_Settings.php (deleted)
/tags/extensions/SemanticFormsInputs/REL_0_4_1/SemanticFormsInputs/SemanticFormsInputs.i18n.php (deleted)
/tags/extensions/SemanticFormsInputs/REL_0_4_1/SemanticFormsInputs/SemanticFormsInputs.php (deleted)
/tags/extensions/SemanticFormsInputs/REL_0_4_1/SemanticFormsInputs/images (deleted)
/tags/extensions/SemanticFormsInputs/REL_0_4_1/SemanticFormsInputs/libs (deleted)
/tags/extensions/SemanticFormsInputs/REL_0_4_1/SemanticFormsInputs/skins (deleted)
/tags/extensions/SemanticFormsInputs/REL_0_4_1/images (added)
/tags/extensions/SemanticFormsInputs/REL_0_4_1/libs (added)
/tags/extensions/SemanticFormsInputs/REL_0_4_1/skins (added)
Comment 2 Sam Reed (reedy) 2011-03-19 22:39:15 UTC
We also don't have a NOOP or similar, if it wasn't actually changed on that path.

If we added one to the ENUM (bleugh), we can just apply that, unless we explicitally know what happened to a path entry..?

In most cases, it's the common subpaths that are the issue
Comment 3 Roan Kattouw 2011-03-20 10:29:15 UTC
Hah I hadn't realized path fragmenting would lead to this. Using a noop action flag sounds good to me.
Comment 4 Sam Reed (reedy) 2011-03-20 13:07:48 UTC
Adding to the enum is ok...

Just wondering how exactly to get it to fix the paths on a back populate..

Delete all, and re-read paths from svn.

We've then got the actions for the explicit paths, and everything else can just be applied noop?
Comment 5 Sam Reed (reedy) 2011-04-08 15:31:17 UTC
r85671

Added NOOP (N). If it's an "N" path, don't display it, just use it for searching

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links